Conference realignment "Rumors" "tweets" "etc"

[Guest PCBull14]

Why the **** do we keep talking about this? Is the media wants to drag this out then so be it. Learn and move on. Like I said with these ass clowns running Tampa sports media be on your game all the time. What's done is done, even though was clearly a draft. 

[ArmyBull]

4 minutes ago, PCBull14 said:

Link that shows it WASN'T a draft?

A difinative link either way would be nice.  

[Guest PCBull14]

Just now, ArmyBull said:

A difinative link either way would be nice.  

Exactly stop leaning on the side of negativity all the time. 

Edited August 17, 2016 by PCBull14

[CousinRicky]

The icing on the cake for me is that on page 3 there is a good article by Joey Knight.  Why not put Joey's on the front page and that drivel from MF on page 3 (if they felt the need to run it all).  Page 2 had a good article by Bob Putnam about keeping local recruits in the area.  But they just had to put that garbage on the front page.

[CousinRicky]

28 minutes ago, ArmyBull said:

Regarding the above:

All this makes the assumption that this WAS a draft.  Link? 

Even in his article Fennelly says it may have been a draft.

[ArmyBull]

6 minutes ago, PCBull14 said:

Exactly stop leaning on the side of negativity all the time. 

Exaggeration is never healthy, no matter what side one leans on.  

[ToroDeFuego]

6 minutes ago, Bourbon Bull said:

Even in his article Fennelly says it may have been a draft.

It was a draft that USF gave out as a response to a FOI request. Greg, as well as someone at USF, told me that. Greg's argument is that they should not have given it out like that. My position is that JK is a big Richard for abusing the trust even if he is not officially bound to show any. If he was covering any decent sized school he would be cut off from access.

Edited August 17, 2016 by ToroDeFuego

[ArmyBull]

2 minutes ago, ToroDeFuego said:

It was a draft that USF gave out as a response to a FOI request. Greg, as well as someone at USF, told me that. Greg's argument is that they should not have given it out like that. My position is that JK is a big Richard for abusing the trust even if he is not officially bound to show any. If he was covering any decent sized school he would be cut off from access.

Thanks Toro!

do you have any info on why USF may not have clarified this with the media? 

[Apis Bull]

1 minute ago, ArmyBull said:

Thanks Toro!

do you have any info on why USF may not have clarified this with the media? 

They're going over their press release, looking for typos.  It may take a while.

[Gismo]

He should be cut from access. FOI it's all "public" but better discretion would be not to tweet pictures but instead write article with quotes saying "documents obtained". 

I think we look foolish with everything in the open. Like we got caught with our pants down. Why aren't we getting these FOI docs from every candidate? 

I think he is making USF look foolish the way he is publishing documents. If I had the power at USF I would hire an outside firm to create the documents that isn't subject to FOI. This is rodiculous now. Only view drafts on firms system in face to face meetings until they are ready.