Jump to content

  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

You take a TO to call a sweep on the 2 point conversion?

NewEnglandBull
 Share

Recommended Posts

Bulls On Parade Toro Magnifico

Bulls On Parade

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  23
  • Content Count:  10,199
  • Reputation:   1,714
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/02/2005
Posted

 

34 minutes ago, Friscobull said:

 I guess I am a novice but why wasn’t the ball on a 2 pt conversion put in the middle of the field and not on the left hash?  

Ive had same question shouldn't the ball be in the middle of the field..dont they do that for extra points all the time or  have I just not noticed?

 I found this online below...so did we choose to put the ball and run that play....ehhh

Conversion (or Convert)
After a touchdown, the team that scored attempts one scrimmage play from any point between the hash marks on or outside the opponents' 5-yard (4.6 m) line.  
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Friscobull Toro Magnifico

Friscobull

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Content Count:  10,846
  • Reputation:   3,962
  • Days Won:  67
  • Joined:  05/23/2019
Posted
1 hour ago, Bulls On Parade said:

 

Ive had same question shouldn't the ball be in the middle of the field..dont they do that for extra points all the time or  have I just not noticed?

 I found this online below...so did we choose to put the ball and run that play....ehhh

Conversion (or Convert)
After a touchdown, the team that scored attempts one scrimmage play from any point between the hash marks on or outside the opponents' 5-yard (4.6 m) line.  

I would really like someone to press CJS on this decision, I know it is easy to Monday morning QB but this play never had a chance and we knew that when they lined up.  Would have been ok with even calling a second TO to bail out of this terrible play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NewEnglandBull Toro Magnifico

NewEnglandBull

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,518
  • Content Count:  42,125
  • Reputation:   8,834
  • Days Won:  344
  • Joined:  11/29/2009
  • Author
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Friscobull said:

I would really like someone to press CJS on this decision, I know it is easy to Monday morning QB but this play never had a chance and we knew that when they lined up.  Would have been ok with even calling a second TO to bail out of this terrible play.

Agreed...I have no problem with a second TO. Indeed, there was little likelihood he had faith that the D would Temple. Take the second TO and get it right. 

Edited by NewEnglandBull
Link to comment
Share on other sites
puc86 Toro Magnifico

puc86

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  147
  • Content Count:  19,249
  • Reputation:   6,138
  • Days Won:  255
  • Joined:  10/13/2002
Posted
4 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said:

Agreed...I have no problem with a second TO. Indeed, there was little likelihood he had faith that the D would Temple. Take the second TO and get it right. 

Until they ran it they thought they did get it right 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NewEnglandBull Toro Magnifico

NewEnglandBull

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,518
  • Content Count:  42,125
  • Reputation:   8,834
  • Days Won:  344
  • Joined:  11/29/2009
  • Author
Posted
10 minutes ago, puc86 said:

Until they ran it they thought they did get it right 

Or the QB did not know it was incorrect, or the QB did not know how to Audible out, or the QB was scared to call a third TO, or the line did a bad job of blocking, or....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
puc86 Toro Magnifico

puc86

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  147
  • Content Count:  19,249
  • Reputation:   6,138
  • Days Won:  255
  • Joined:  10/13/2002
Posted
45 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said:

Or the QB did not know it was incorrect, or the QB did not know how to Audible out, or the QB was scared to call a third TO, or the line did a bad job of blocking, or....

I agree it’s clearly the fault of a 19 year old playing for free and making snap decisions and not the adults that are in charge, practiced the play over and over and called a timeout to pick the play and go over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NewEnglandBull Toro Magnifico

NewEnglandBull

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,518
  • Content Count:  42,125
  • Reputation:   8,834
  • Days Won:  344
  • Joined:  11/29/2009
  • Author
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, puc86 said:

I agree it’s clearly the fault of a 19 year old playing for free and making snap decisions and not the adults that are in charge, practiced the play over and over and called a timeout to pick the play and go over it.

Nice try but players do have responsibilities and last I checked he is getting a college scholarship along with meals and a stipend...hardly free....

Edited by NewEnglandBull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.

Got it!
Dismiss