Meanwhile in Orlando

[USFStPete]

2 minutes ago, atsKnight said:

That's definitely a possibility. 

I'm interested in how you phrased that, "crave acceptance" and "always be inferior". 

If I'm just some UCF troll, feel free to ignore me, but if you're wanting to engage on this stuff, I would be happy to. Again, I'm fine dropping it right there, but if you want to keep commenting, I'll assume you want to talk about it. 

This is the first time I've commented...what is it you want to talk about?

[USFStPete]

2 minutes ago, ForestBull said:

I bet you get hung up on by telemarketers 

Hahahahah that's pretty funny.  Even if you didn't come up with it yourself

[atsKnight]

1 minute ago, ForestBull said:

I bet you get hung up on by telemarketers 

Would you feel embarrassed if a telemarketer did that to you? 

Seems like you might be another example of insecurity. 

[USFStPete]

1 minute ago, atsKnight said:

Would you feel embarrassed if a telemarketer did that to you? 

Seems like you might be another example of insecurity. 

Bold strategy Cotton.  He's going with the old "reverse psychology".

[atsKnight]

2 minutes ago, USFStPete said:

This is the first time I've commented...what is it you want to talk about?

How do you measure if another person 'craves acceptance' or will 'always be inferior'? Those seem like confident and definitive statements. 

Just now, USFStPete said:

Bold strategy Cotton.  He's going with the old "reverse psychology".

How is that reverse psychology?

[USFStPete]

Because I'm pretty confident in my ability to read people, and everything I've seen from every UCF fan I know points right to these characteristics.

You can try to deflect it, but it has nothing to do with me.

[atsKnight]

Just now, USFStPete said:

Because I'm pretty confident in my ability to read people, and everything I've seen from every UCF fan I know points right to these characteristics.

You can try to deflect it, but it has nothing to do with me.

Deflect and reverse psychology, I don't think these words mean what you think they mean. 

How definitively you read people has everything to do with you. You're the one making the judgments, deciding the right sample size. You even point how important anecdotal evidence is to you. And the judgments you make point to your insecurities. 

UCF fans all seem to crave acceptance. What are you reading that allows you to see inside someone's head? Are you seeing the craving for acceptance in me?

[USFStPete]

10 minutes ago, atsKnight said:

How do you measure if another person 'craves acceptance' or will 'always be inferior'? Those seem like confident and definitive statements. 

How is that reverse psychology?

In this instance, nothing more than your lame passive-aggressive attempt to regain control of the argument.

[USFStPete]

3 minutes ago, atsKnight said:

Deflect and reverse psychology, I don't think these words mean what you think they mean. 

How definitively you read people has everything to do with you. You're the one making the judgments, deciding the right sample size. You even point how important anecdotal evidence is to you. And the judgments you make point to your insecurities. 

UCF fans all seem to crave acceptance. What are you reading that allows you to see inside someone's head? Are you seeing the craving for acceptance in me?

Yes, I absolutely am.  So is everyone else.

[atsKnight]

1 minute ago, USFStPete said:

In this instance, nothing more than your lame passive-aggressive attempt to regain control of the argument.

I'm not sure what's passive at all about my interactions. I'm honestly not sure how I could be any more direct. 

But let's try: my current hypothesis is that one of us is clearly craving acceptance from the other. I've explained my motivation for being here and engaging ad nauseam. Why are you explaining yourself to me? If UCF fans are inferior, why are you defending your definitions and ability to read people? Why not just walk away, ignore the passive aggressive troll?

Clearly one of us needs acceptance from the other.