Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  74
  • Content Count:  2,322
  • Reputation:   775
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  07/02/2016

Posted (edited)

Tonight got me thinking about our previous success with the offense. The two biggest threats we had aside from Q last year were Adams and Mack. You can’t tell me that Scantling, Solomon, Tice, and Johnson are not capable enough to compensate for the loss in these players from last year. This has NOTHING to do with lack of player takent.  It’s all there. It just isn’t used properly and that’s saddening, especially for the seniors on this team. 

Edited by OcalaBull2

  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  24
  • Content Count:  6,530
  • Reputation:   1,546
  • Days Won:  12
  • Joined:  11/12/2011

Posted
Just now, OcalaBull2 said:

Tonight got me thinking about our previous success with the offense. The two biggest threats we had aside from Q last year were Adams and Mack. You can’t tell me that Scantling, Solomon, Tice, and Johnson are not capable enough to compensate for the loss in these players from last year. This has NOTHING to do with lack of player takent.  It’s all there. It just isn’t used properly. 

Changing the offense will be the downfall of this team.


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  55
  • Content Count:  6,740
  • Reputation:   1,743
  • Days Won:  17
  • Joined:  11/04/2012

Posted

It is a loss but not one we can't overcome given the current talent we have and the talent we are playing against.

It is a poor excuse being used to shield a staff that won't utilize the players properly.


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  24
  • Content Count:  6,530
  • Reputation:   1,546
  • Days Won:  12
  • Joined:  11/12/2011

Posted
1 minute ago, George_Bullnard_Shaw said:

It is a loss but not one we can't overcome given the current talent we have and the talent we are playing against.

It is a poor excuse being used to shield a staff that won't utilize the players properly.

The only reason we’ve been winning is the other teams don’t have the talent we have. We saw tonight how CCS got outcoached against a team with similar abilities as us. 

  • Upvote 1

  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  55
  • Content Count:  6,740
  • Reputation:   1,743
  • Days Won:  17
  • Joined:  11/04/2012

Posted
Just now, Rex Havoc said:

The only reason we’ve been winning is the other teams don’t have the talent we have. We saw tonight how CCS got outcoached against a team with similar abilities as us. 

That was made abundantly clear tonight. Ed O'Neill, Carr and their new QB were the three players that had comparable talent and they beat us.


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  64
  • Content Count:  9,884
  • Reputation:   2,232
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  09/20/2014

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Rex Havoc said:

Changing the offense will be the downfall of this team.

This.

We still lost games even with Mack & Adams, but at least we were electric. Right now we are tepid at best

Edited by Roaming Bull

  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  24
  • Content Count:  6,530
  • Reputation:   1,546
  • Days Won:  12
  • Joined:  11/12/2011

Posted
2 minutes ago, Roaming Bull said:

This.

We still lost games even with Mack & Adams, but at least we were electric. Right now we are tepid at best

Even in defeat the offense was fun to watch. Last years offense would have put 40 plus up on this Houston team. 


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  64
  • Content Count:  9,884
  • Reputation:   2,232
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  09/20/2014

Posted
5 minutes ago, Rex Havoc said:

Even in defeat the offense was fun to watch. Last years offense would have put 40 plus up on this Houston team. 

If we were running that style of offense we’d score 40 a game easy. This style switch is ridiculous.shows that CWT & crew were much better scheming on the offensive side of the ball then Gilbert & CCS


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  263
  • Content Count:  24,750
  • Reputation:   3,107
  • Days Won:  87
  • Joined:  12/15/2009

Posted
17 minutes ago, OcalaBull2 said:

Tonight got me thinking about our previous success with the offense. The two biggest threats we had aside from Q last year were Adams and Mack. You can’t tell me that Scantling, Solomon, Tice, and Johnson are not capable enough to compensate for the loss in these players from last year. This has NOTHING to do with lack of player takent.  It’s all there. It just isn’t used properly and that’s saddening, especially for the seniors on this team. 

 

15 minutes ago, Rex Havoc said:

Changing the offense will be the downfall of this team.

You are both correct.


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  246
  • Content Count:  6,348
  • Reputation:   662
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  05/25/2006

Posted

I just don't think anyone we have on this team have the speed or good enough playmakers to equal what Mack and Adams brought. 

Tice and Johnson don't have the speed Mack had to bounce outside. 

Scantling does not have the speed Adams had to make the big or breakaway plays. 

Our guys are getting caught from behind. Mack and Adams did not get caught as often. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...