Mack and Adams

[OcalaBull2]

Tonight got me thinking about our previous success with the offense. The two biggest threats we had aside from Q last year were Adams and Mack. You can’t tell me that Scantling, Solomon, Tice, and Johnson are not capable enough to compensate for the loss in these players from last year. This has NOTHING to do with lack of player takent.  It’s all there. It just isn’t used properly and that’s saddening, especially for the seniors on this team. 

Edited October 29, 2017 by OcalaBull2

[Rex Havoc]

Just now, OcalaBull2 said:

Tonight got me thinking about our previous success with the offense. The two biggest threats we had aside from Q last year were Adams and Mack. You can’t tell me that Scantling, Solomon, Tice, and Johnson are not capable enough to compensate for the loss in these players from last year. This has NOTHING to do with lack of player takent.  It’s all there. It just isn’t used properly. 

Changing the offense will be the downfall of this team.

[George_Bullnard_Shaw]

It is a loss but not one we can't overcome given the current talent we have and the talent we are playing against.

It is a poor excuse being used to shield a staff that won't utilize the players properly.

[Rex Havoc]

1 minute ago, George_Bullnard_Shaw said:

It is a loss but not one we can't overcome given the current talent we have and the talent we are playing against.

It is a poor excuse being used to shield a staff that won't utilize the players properly.

The only reason we’ve been winning is the other teams don’t have the talent we have. We saw tonight how CCS got outcoached against a team with similar abilities as us. 

[George_Bullnard_Shaw]

Just now, Rex Havoc said:

The only reason we’ve been winning is the other teams don’t have the talent we have. We saw tonight how CCS got outcoached against a team with similar abilities as us. 

That was made abundantly clear tonight. Ed O'Neill, Carr and their new QB were the three players that had comparable talent and they beat us.

[Roaming Bull]

4 minutes ago, Rex Havoc said:

Changing the offense will be the downfall of this team.

This.

We still lost games even with Mack & Adams, but at least we were electric. Right now we are tepid at best

Edited October 29, 2017 by Roaming Bull

[Rex Havoc]

2 minutes ago, Roaming Bull said:

This.

We still lost games even with Mack & Adams, but at least we were electric. Right now we are tepid at best

Even in defeat the offense was fun to watch. Last years offense would have put 40 plus up on this Houston team. 

[Roaming Bull]

5 minutes ago, Rex Havoc said:

Even in defeat the offense was fun to watch. Last years offense would have put 40 plus up on this Houston team. 

If we were running that style of offense we’d score 40 a game easy. This style switch is ridiculous.shows that CWT & crew were much better scheming on the offensive side of the ball then Gilbert & CCS

[GaUSFBull]

17 minutes ago, OcalaBull2 said:

Tonight got me thinking about our previous success with the offense. The two biggest threats we had aside from Q last year were Adams and Mack. You can’t tell me that Scantling, Solomon, Tice, and Johnson are not capable enough to compensate for the loss in these players from last year. This has NOTHING to do with lack of player takent.  It’s all there. It just isn’t used properly and that’s saddening, especially for the seniors on this team. 

 

15 minutes ago, Rex Havoc said:

Changing the offense will be the downfall of this team.

You are both correct.

[usfgrad84]

I just don't think anyone we have on this team have the speed or good enough playmakers to equal what Mack and Adams brought. 

Tice and Johnson don't have the speed Mack had to bounce outside. 

Scantling does not have the speed Adams had to make the big or breakaway plays. 

Our guys are getting caught from behind. Mack and Adams did not get caught as often.