charsibb Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted March 23, 2017 I'd rather add all of Navy's other sports, but I'm not opposed to the Shockers if the Middies won't go all in. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted March 23, 2017 28 minutes ago, charsibb said: I'd rather add all of Navy's other sports, but I'm not opposed to the Shockers if the Middies won't go all in. Navy brings zero the table in other sports. WSU brings money. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Just now, JTrue said: Navy brings zero the table in other sports. WSU brings money. Navy brings a national audience and a degree of personal and professional respect for its students that WSU can never achieve. 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted March 23, 2017 11 minutes ago, charsibb said: Navy brings a national audience and a degree of personal and professional respect for its students that WSU can never achieve. We have Navy's national audience for football. They aren't bringing jack in that regard for the rest of their athletic programs. And I highly doubt our conference raises its "personal and professional" profile by adding men's soccer to the AAC. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Just now, JTrue said: We have Navy's national audience for football. They aren't bringing jack in that regard for the rest of their athletic programs. And I highly doubt our conference raises its "personal and professional" profile by adding men's soccer to the AAC. If we're adding a men's soccer team, I'd still rather play Navy than WSU. Shockers bring a basketball audience - I get it - and I'm not opposed to them joining. Still. Rather have Navy than WSU. If we can have both, hope WSU brings back football and gets good. Quick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Just now, charsibb said: If we're adding a men's soccer team, I'd still rather play Navy than WSU. Shockers bring a basketball audience - I get it - and I'm not opposed to them joining. Still. Rather have Navy than WSU. If we can have both, hope WSU brings back football and gets good. Quick. But we aren't adding WSU for anything other than the single thing they bring and we have Navy for the only thing they bring. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Just now, JTrue said: But we aren't adding WSU for anything other than the single thing they bring and we have Navy for the only thing they bring. All the reports I've seen have WSU moving ALL sports to the AAC. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted March 23, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, charsibb said: All the reports I've seen have WSU moving ALL sports to the AAC. They're a warm body who is competitive in most sports and brings dollars in basketball. We have the only thing Navy brings already. That's the point. WSU doesn't make our other sports weaker, Navy does. Navy brings absolutely zero to the table that isn't already there. Hell, I'd bet most people don't even know Navy isn't a full member already. So we get their loftiness by association with no downside. Edited March 23, 2017 by JTrue 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted March 23, 2017 If Navy wanted to move all their sports in, would you veto it if you could? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted March 23, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, charsibb said: If Navy wanted to move all their sports in, would you veto it if you could? If it was them or Wichita. Absolutely. Navy has one thing, football. Wichita lacks one thing, football. This is a perfect match. Edited March 23, 2017 by JTrue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now