Capital H Posted January 24, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 106 Content Count: 1,318 Reputation: 265 Days Won: 2 Joined: 08/15/2008 Share Posted January 24, 2016 (edited) On 1/16/2016 at 11:39 AM, slick1ru2 said: BJ Daniels has a 0 overall rating at QB in the latest weekly roster update. He's listed as a WR is most likely why, but his WR rating is 57 with slow for a wr 83 speed. His catch ratings aren't bad though. His arm strength is rated below average. For the uninitiated, Madden updates rosters weekly during the season, changing player ratings, position and injury status for the week based on the previous week's events. EA was too lazy to even change his position back to QB when he went to the Texans weeks ago. 57 would put him with the lowest rated players in the game, he is the lowest rated wr, the next lowest rated is Neal Sterling on the Jags rated 59. I didn't go through all the ratings, he may be the lowest in the game. Here's a letter the lowest rated player sent John Madden a few years back, lol. Hilarious. http://www.woosk.com/2010/05/ethan-albrights-letter-to-john-madden-about-being-the-lowest-rated-player-in-madden-football.html I love BJ but we are talking about a 3rd string QB/ 7th string WR who spent most of the year on the practice squad. He is slow for a WR, with a 4.6 40 (Jordy Nelson runs a 4.5). The arm strength is silly but if they are basing it off NFL results there isnt much to go by unfortunately. As a guy who goes back and forth to the practice squad I would expect him to be one of the lowest rated players week in and week out. Edited January 24, 2016 by Capital H 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick1ru2 Posted January 30, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 553 Content Count: 14,405 Reputation: 434 Days Won: 13 Joined: 07/25/2008 Author Share Posted January 30, 2016 On January 22, 2016 at 8:53 PM, JTrue said: For anyone who's interested, here is the email I sent a friend of mine who works for EA and is a UCF grad. Jeff, Since you work at EA in Orlando, you're going to settle an argument a bunch of us are having on the USF board. I'm going to assume you're being honest when you do, even though you're a UCF grad. 1) What percent of the people in your office are UCF grads? 2) How much bias is involved in assigning ratings to players? 3) Have you ever personally screwed us because of your poor choice in higher education? Jeff 7:02 PM (1 hour ago) to me Hey man. 1. I have no idea. There are a few but I don't really ask everyone where they went to school. 2. None. It's an algorithm based on previous years stats, games played and some other influences. 3. Every chance I get, which is none. Suck it. It's updated weekly, they are still updating it. The latest version they have moved him on the Texans roster from QB to WR and haven't changed his player type to QB. Looking deeper at his ratings, they have under his traits they have him as a scrambling QB that's trigger happy and forces passes. He's the 7th worse rated WR in all of Madden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedBull13 Posted February 1, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 22 Content Count: 360 Reputation: 154 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/13/2013 Share Posted February 1, 2016 For what its worth, EA Sports also used to make the NCAA games, which was basically Madden for colleges. Its final year (it got discontinued due to licensing issues) was NCAA14, which some of you may remember (or not, I personally try to repress it) as the year that UCiF won the Fiesta Bowl and we scraped out a whopping 2 wins. In that game, we were actually ranked higher than UCF. Sure it was by a measly one point (we were 87, they were 86 I believe) but still... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted February 1, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted February 1, 2016 1 hour ago, RedBull13 said: For what its worth, EA Sports also used to make the NCAA games, which was basically Madden for colleges. Its final year (it got discontinued due to licensing issues) was NCAA14, which some of you may remember (or not, I personally try to repress it) as the year that UCiF won the Fiesta Bowl and we scraped out a whopping 2 wins. In that game, we were actually ranked higher than UCF. Sure it was by a measly one point (we were 87, they were 86 I believe) but still... So we should have been a 100 that year and those ************* lowered us all the way down to an 87 just to keep us close to UCF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick1ru2 Posted February 2, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 553 Content Count: 14,405 Reputation: 434 Days Won: 13 Joined: 07/25/2008 Author Share Posted February 2, 2016 An 86 non BCS team. Not unless its Boise St or BYU. Anyway, The latest roster update has BJ back at QB, still listed as a WR and still O rating at that position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedBull13 Posted February 3, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 22 Content Count: 360 Reputation: 154 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/13/2013 Share Posted February 3, 2016 On 2/2/2016 at 0:41 AM, slick1ru2 said: An 86 non BCS team. Not unless its Boise St or BYU. Anyway, The latest roster update has BJ back at QB, still listed as a WR and still O rating at that position. Correction: We were 84, they were 83 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now