Is it the talent?

[slick1ru2]

First defensive lineman.  Sorry about leaving that out. But I knew who would come in and jump on it, just not which of their multiple TBP IDs they'd use.

[GaUSFBull]

First defensive lineman.  Sorry about leaving that out. But I knew who would come in and jump on it, just not which of their multiple TBP IDs they'd use.

 

I'm really flattered I'm on your mind, whether the forefront or the back of it, every time you post, but I'm a happily married man.  

[slick1ru2]

 

 

Not to mention an established, successful HC.

 

 

Great coaching and experience can trump talent. You guys see Clowney against NC? He was contained for most of the game. The player people say is going to be the first defensive player to win the Heisman, across from at least 1 new starter, was limited to 3 tackles and 3 QB Hurries..against NC? How? Coaching.

 

 

 

First defensive player to win the Heisman was Charles Woodson, big guy.

 

And the coach at UNC, Larry Fedora, right?  He's in his 2nd season at UNC now, so I think he's in a better position to know the capabilities of his players when the so-called "bullets" are flying, unlike a first-year guy like ... Willie Taggart, for example.  

 

 

 

BTW, the issues were on the defense, Eveld fixed the offense pretty much. And I've been told by numerous people on this forum that USF's new DC, with 19 years of NFL experience, would work wonders for the defense, especially the DL.  He also has a lot of experience coaching when the "bullets fly".

Edited September 2, 2013 by slick1ru2

[Triple B]

 

 

 

Not to mention an established, successful HC.

 

 

Great coaching and experience can trump talent. You guys see Clowney against NC? He was contained for most of the game. The player people say is going to be the first defensive player to win the Heisman, across from at least 1 new starter, was limited to 3 tackles and 3 QB Hurries..against NC? How? Coaching.

 

 

 

First defensive player to win the Heisman was Charles Woodson, big guy.

 

And the coach at UNC, Larry Fedora, right?  He's in his 2nd season at UNC now, so I think he's in a better position to know the capabilities of his players when the so-called "bullets" are flying, unlike a first-year guy like ... Willie Taggart, for example.  

 

 

 

BTW, the issues were on the defense, Eveld fixed the offense pretty much. And I've been told by numerous people on this forum that USF's new DC, with 19 years of NFL experience, would work wonders for the defense, especially the DL.  He also has a lot of experience coaching when the "bullets fly".

 

 

Eveld was going against a prevent defense most of the time, which probably helped him look better. You reverse the rotation and he may have had the same problems ..

[slick1ru2]

 

 

 

 

Not to mention an established, successful HC.

 

 

Great coaching and experience can trump talent. You guys see Clowney against NC? He was contained for most of the game. The player people say is going to be the first defensive player to win the Heisman, across from at least 1 new starter, was limited to 3 tackles and 3 QB Hurries..against NC? How? Coaching.

 

 

 

First defensive player to win the Heisman was Charles Woodson, big guy.

 

And the coach at UNC, Larry Fedora, right?  He's in his 2nd season at UNC now, so I think he's in a better position to know the capabilities of his players when the so-called "bullets" are flying, unlike a first-year guy like ... Willie Taggart, for example.  

 

 

 

BTW, the issues were on the defense, Eveld fixed the offense pretty much. And I've been told by numerous people on this forum that USF's new DC, with 19 years of NFL experience, would work wonders for the defense, especially the DL.  He also has a lot of experience coaching when the "bullets fly".

 

 

Eveld was going against a prevent defense most of the time, which probably helped him look better. You reverse the rotation and he may have had the same problems ..

 

Point is, the defense couldn't stop the run and never did anything to fix that.