BullGrad95 Posted September 1, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 89 Content Count: 880 Reputation: 13 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/24/2001 Share Posted September 1, 2013 Just heard on the broadcast that the DC for McNeese was CWT's DC last year at WKU. Anyone remember how a certain John Gruden knew EXACTLY what the Raiders were running when they lost to the Bucs in the Super Bowl? Look, I know this is not the reason we lost the game, but is does stand to reason that McNeese had a good understanding of the offensive tendencies of CWT and played to those strengths tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmhatter Posted September 1, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 576 Content Count: 8,174 Reputation: 268 Days Won: 6 Joined: 09/02/2007 Share Posted September 1, 2013 And willie was their DCs head coach? Wouldn't that at least negate their advantage? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick1ru2 Posted September 1, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 555 Content Count: 14,415 Reputation: 445 Days Won: 13 Joined: 07/25/2008 Share Posted September 1, 2013 (edited) We heard it all game on ESPN3. I said it in the chat room. Except his old DC looked like Gruden. Doesn't change anything. Maybe he should have taken him with him to USF. Edited September 1, 2013 by slick1ru2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted September 1, 2013 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,737 Reputation: 10,961 Days Won: 425 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted September 1, 2013 Just heard on the broadcast that the DC for McNeese was CWT's DC last year at WKU. Anyone remember how a certain John Gruden knew EXACTLY what the Raiders were running when they lost to the Bucs in the Super Bowl? Look, I know this is not the reason we lost the game, but is does stand to reason that McNeese had a good understanding of the offensive tendencies of CWT and played to those strengths tonight. It looked like just the opposite to me. The MSU OC being very familiar with our defense and knew what to call, when. I know we gave them a short field too many times but they had some long ass drives mixed in there, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deters- Posted September 1, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 67 Content Count: 3,749 Reputation: 309 Days Won: 3 Joined: 07/22/2008 Share Posted September 1, 2013 Just heard on the broadcast that the DC for McNeese was CWT's DC last year at WKU. Anyone remember how a certain John Gruden knew EXACTLY what the Raiders were running when they lost to the Bucs in the Super Bowl? Look, I know this is not the reason we lost the game, but is does stand to reason that McNeese had a good understanding of the offensive tendencies of CWT and played to those strengths tonight. It looked like just the opposite to me. The MSU OC being very familiar with our defense and knew what to call, when. I know we gave them a short field too many times but they had some long ass drives mixed in there, too. multiple times with a short field, quick turnaround due to turnovers, 3 n outs and short drives = one tired ass defense. They had nearly 10 minutes more TOP. Our defense was gassed and the offense didn't help them at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted September 1, 2013 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,737 Reputation: 10,961 Days Won: 425 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted September 1, 2013 Just heard on the broadcast that the DC for McNeese was CWT's DC last year at WKU. Anyone remember how a certain John Gruden knew EXACTLY what the Raiders were running when they lost to the Bucs in the Super Bowl? Look, I know this is not the reason we lost the game, but is does stand to reason that McNeese had a good understanding of the offensive tendencies of CWT and played to those strengths tonight. It looked like just the opposite to me. The MSU OC being very familiar with our defense and knew what to call, when. I know we gave them a short field too many times but they had some long ass drives mixed in there, too. multiple times with a short field, quick turnaround due to turnovers, 3 n outs and short drives = one tired ass defense. They had nearly 10 minutes more TOP. Our defense was gassed and the offense didn't help them at all. Good points ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted September 1, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 263 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted September 1, 2013 Just heard on the broadcast that the DC for McNeese was CWT's DC last year at WKU. Anyone remember how a certain John Gruden knew EXACTLY what the Raiders were running when they lost to the Bucs in the Super Bowl? Look, I know this is not the reason we lost the game, but is does stand to reason that McNeese had a good understanding of the offensive tendencies of CWT and played to those strengths tonight. It looked like just the opposite to me. The MSU OC being very familiar with our defense and knew what to call, when. I know we gave them a short field too many times but they had some long ass drives mixed in there, too. multiple times with a short field, quick turnaround due to turnovers, 3 n outs and short drives = one tired ass defense. They had nearly 10 minutes more TOP. Our defense was gassed and the offense didn't help them at all. Man, that sounds so familiar ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deters- Posted September 1, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 67 Content Count: 3,749 Reputation: 309 Days Won: 3 Joined: 07/22/2008 Share Posted September 1, 2013 Just heard on the broadcast that the DC for McNeese was CWT's DC last year at WKU. Anyone remember how a certain John Gruden knew EXACTLY what the Raiders were running when they lost to the Bucs in the Super Bowl? Look, I know this is not the reason we lost the game, but is does stand to reason that McNeese had a good understanding of the offensive tendencies of CWT and played to those strengths tonight. It looked like just the opposite to me. The MSU OC being very familiar with our defense and knew what to call, when. I know we gave them a short field too many times but they had some long ass drives mixed in there, too. multiple times with a short field, quick turnaround due to turnovers, 3 n outs and short drives = one tired ass defense. They had nearly 10 minutes more TOP. Our defense was gassed and the offense didn't help them at all. Man, that sounds so familiar ... That it does. We played nearly the worst possible game in terms of errors and mistakes. McNeese played a perfect game. No overcoming that. Even though I'm positive there is more talent on our team than theirs, we would have lost to Gaither if we played like we did tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McNeese722 Posted September 1, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 1 Content Count: 52 Reputation: 1 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/04/2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 Just heard on the broadcast that the DC for McNeese was CWT's DC last year at WKU. Anyone remember how a certain John Gruden knew EXACTLY what the Raiders were running when they lost to the Bucs in the Super Bowl? Look, I know this is not the reason we lost the game, but is does stand to reason that McNeese had a good understanding of the offensive tendencies of CWT and played to those strengths tonight. It looked like just the opposite to me. The MSU OC being very familiar with our defense and knew what to call, when. I know we gave them a short field too many times but they had some long ass drives mixed in there, too. multiple times with a short field, quick turnaround due to turnovers, 3 n outs and short drives = one tired ass defense. They had nearly 10 minutes more TOP. Our defense was gassed and the offense didn't help them at all. Man, that sounds so familiar ... That it does. We played nearly the worst possible game in terms of errors and mistakes. McNeese played a perfect game. No overcoming that. Even though I'm positive there is more talent on our team than theirs, we would have lost to Gaither if we played like we did tonight. Not really perfect. We had a pass intercepted, had some dropped passes, a LB getting out of position on your first offensive play, and our FS got beat on a couple of passes for TD's. Things like that have to improve if we are going to make the playoffs and make any noise in them against teams like North Dakota St. Doc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrmrPokeCenter Posted September 1, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 27 Reputation: 2 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/25/2006 Share Posted September 1, 2013 Just heard on the broadcast that the DC for McNeese was CWT's DC last year at WKU. Anyone remember how a certain John Gruden knew EXACTLY what the Raiders were running when they lost to the Bucs in the Super Bowl? Look, I know this is not the reason we lost the game, but is does stand to reason that McNeese had a good understanding of the offensive tendencies of CWT and played to those strengths tonight. It looked like just the opposite to me. The MSU OC being very familiar with our defense and knew what to call, when. I know we gave them a short field too many times but they had some long ass drives mixed in there, too. multiple times with a short field, quick turnaround due to turnovers, 3 n outs and short drives = one tired ass defense. They had nearly 10 minutes more TOP. Our defense was gassed and the offense didn't help them at all. Man, that sounds so familiar ... That it does. We played nearly the worst possible game in terms of errors and mistakes. McNeese played a perfect game. No overcoming that. Even though I'm positive there is more talent on our team than theirs, we would have lost to Gaither if we played like we did tonight. Not really perfect. We had a pass intercepted, had some dropped passes, a LB getting out of position on your first offensive play, and our FS got beat on a couple of passes for TD's. Things like that have to improve if we are going to make the playoffs and make any noise in them against teams like North Dakota St. Doc Matt and Lance will get those things corrected after some film work this week....the FS getting beat like that concerns me a little.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now