bull2bull Posted December 1, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 558 Reputation: 100 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/02/2005 Share Posted December 1, 2009 Things to notice below: Obviously height and size differences but also location (Miami gets into Texas, Tenn, Iowa and Nebraska) Our extra $ in attendance this year should easily pay for recruiting trips outside of FL. Also one of UM's best lineman(Fox) did not even play Saturday night...geesh!The question arises: How did the 3 teams that beat them (NC, VT, Clemson) as well as Wake (should have beat them) and Duke deal with the UM OL? I would guess most of these teams are equally sized to us. Makes you want to check out a replay and see what happened. Only thing obvious is that UM played pretty much mistake-free football. Only fumble was recovered by UM and we also dropped an int from Jaccory. A number of their players mentioned this was the first game all season they all played together.66 McCaskill, Kevin OC 6-2 295 So. Tallahassee, FL (Godby HS) 69 Garvin, Josh OG 6-4 273 RFr. Lakeland, FL (Lake Gibson HS) 61 Hermann, Zach OG 6-3 313 Jr. Oldsmar, FL (East Lake HS) 63 Bass, Jamar OL 6-4 290 Jr. Apopka, FL (Hutchinson CC) (Apopka HS) 60 Estenor, Danous OL 6-3 296 So. Palm Beach, FL (Palm Beach Central HS) 62 Genus, Sampson OL 6-1 314 Jr. Lake City, FL (Columbia HS) 79 Hine, Chaz OL 6-4 294 So. Lithia, FL (Newsome HS) 76 Jacques, Steven OL 6-4 292 Fr. Hollywood, FL (South Broward HS) 71 McGhin, John OL 6-3 300 Fr. Tallahassee, FL (Florida HS) 75 Powe, Darren OL 6-3 266 So. Mayo, FL (Lafayette HS) 55 Warren, Jeremiah OL 6-4 315 So. Panama City, FL (Bay HS) 73 Edwards, Damien OT 6-6 313 RFr. Chandler, AZ (Chandler HS) 74 Popek, Mark OT 6-7 305 RFr. Plant City, FL (Plant City HS) 64 Sims, Jacob OT 6-5 290 Jr. Winter Park, FL (Winter Park HS) 61 Figueroa, Joel Offensive Line 6-5/330 JR Miami, Fla./North Miami HS 62 Lopez, Eduardo Offensive Line 6-0/315 FR Miami, Fla./Southwest Miami 63 Horn, Tyler Offensive Line 6-4/300 SO Memphis, Tenn./University HS 64 Fox, Jason Offensive Tackle 6-7/314 SR Fort Worth, Texas/North Crowley HS 65 Pipho, Matt Offensive Line 6-7/307 SR LaPorte City, Iowa/Union HS 66 Gunn, Harland Offensive Line 6-2/315 SO Omaha, Neb./Central HS 68 Symonette, Ian Offensive Line 6-9/349 JR Nassau, Bahamas/St. Pius (Houston) 69 Goldstein, Sean Linebacker 6-0/225 RS FR Dresher, Pa./Chestnut Hill Academy 70 Trump, A.J. Guard 6-3/300 SR Clearwater, Fla./Clearwater Central Catholic HS 71 White, Cory Offensive Line 6-5/260 FR Orange Park, Fla./Fleming Island HS 72 Washington, Brandon Offensive Line 6-4/330 FR Miami, Fla./Milford (NY) Academy 74 Franklin, Orlando Offensive Line 6-7/318 JR Delray Beach, Fla./Atlantic HS 75 Wheeler, Jared Offensive Line 6-5/330 FR Miami, Fla./American Heritage HS 78 Johnson, Jermaine Offensive Line 6-6/310 FR Fort Lauderdale, Fla./Hargrave Military Academy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullsluvinlady Posted December 1, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 35 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/12/2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 The problem isn't merely that we were outsized, but that Leavitt and the coaching staff don't even REALIZE that we need size on the line.There was an article before this season about our OLine freakin' dieting so as to be more athletic getting upfield blocking linebackers and the secondary when we move the pocket.Unfortunately it doesn't quite work out when teams can rush four and pressure our QB into bad decisions, if not plant his facemask in the turf.We need big fatties on the line, period. Preferably a few from cold climates that can go up to Pittsburgh and New Jersey and Cincinnati every year in the cold and get a push up front. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull Dozer Posted December 1, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 13,697 Reputation: 2,041 Days Won: 45 Joined: 09/04/2006 Share Posted December 1, 2009 It has more to do with skill than size. You are not in a good spot when you are starting 2 walk on's on your line......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IncrediBULL Posted December 1, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 7,201 Reputation: 43 Days Won: 3 Joined: 01/02/2002 Share Posted December 1, 2009 Skill is key. But size does matter, and it was clear when we lined up we were the undersized team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull94 Posted December 1, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 8,722 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 23 Joined: 02/02/2005 Share Posted December 1, 2009 we outweighed rutgers d-line by 50lbs per man.we rushed 32 times for 30 yards and were sacked 7 times. bigger isn't always better. sometimes it's about scheme. our d-line was built to defend against speed teams like WVU. we get bullied by more physical teams. Miami's o-line just looked good because they played to our weakness and ran it down our throats. coaches might want to adjust to that either in recruiting or schemes.Miami o-line is not real good. they rank #91 in the country for sacks against and #66 in the country for rushing. they gave up 5 sacks to wake forest and 6 sacks to UCF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted December 1, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted December 1, 2009 The problem isn't merely that we were outsized, but that Leavitt and the coaching staff don't even REALIZE that we need size on the line.Leavitt obviously wants to get bigger O-Line. The recruits have to cooperate as well.There was an article before this season about our OLine freakin' dieting so as to be more athletic getting upfield blocking linebackers and the secondary when we move the pocket.Uh, that was LAST season.Unfortunately it doesn't quite work out when teams can rush four and pressure our QB into bad decisions, if not plant his facemask in the turf.We need big fatties on the line, period. Preferably a few from cold climates that can go up to Pittsburgh and New Jersey and Cincinnati every year in the cold and get a push up front.Again, that's the same thing Leavitt said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted December 1, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted December 1, 2009 our coaches dont know what they are doing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull94 Posted December 1, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 8,722 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 23 Joined: 02/02/2005 Share Posted December 1, 2009 The problem isn't merely that we were outsized, but that Leavitt and the coaching staff don't even REALIZE that we need size on the line.Leavitt obviously wants to get bigger O-Line. The recruits have to cooperate as well.There was an article before this season about our OLine freakin' dieting so as to be more athletic getting upfield blocking linebackers and the secondary when we move the pocket.Uh, that was LAST season.Unfortunately it doesn't quite work out when teams can rush four and pressure our QB into bad decisions, if not plant his facemask in the turf.We need big fatties on the line, period. Preferably a few from cold climates that can go up to Pittsburgh and New Jersey and Cincinnati every year in the cold and get a push up front.Again, that's the same thing Leavitt said.so his philosophy was to have them lose weight last season but now he wants them bigger? You don't see a problem with that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snarling Bull Posted December 1, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 6,574 Reputation: 237 Days Won: 2 Joined: 07/19/2006 Share Posted December 1, 2009 we outweighed rutgers d-line by 50lbs per man.we rushed 32 times for 30 yards and were sacked 7 times. bigger isn't always better. sometimes it's about scheme. our d-line was built to defend against speed teams like WVU. we get bullied by more physical teams. Miami's o-line just looked good because they played to our weakness and ran it down our throats. coaches might want to adjust to that either in recruiting or schemes.Miami o-line is not real good. they rank #91 in the country for sacks against and #66 in the country for rushing. they gave up 5 sacks to wake forest and 6 sacks to UCF.+1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull94 Posted December 1, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 8,722 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 23 Joined: 02/02/2005 Share Posted December 1, 2009 BTW UCF held Miami to 70 yards rushing on 46 carries and had 6 sacks. that's not exactly a dominant o- line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.