flsportsfan83 Posted June 26, 2011 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 17,499 Reputation: 1,251 Days Won: 13 Joined: 08/16/2004 Author Share Posted June 26, 2011 poses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nybullsfan Posted June 26, 2011 Share Posted June 26, 2011 No interaction between the cop in the bushes and the person who is ALREADY breaking the lawvs.Someone who is not breaking a law being enticed to do so by an LEO so they can be arrested.Big difference.the way these stings work is a Cop who is posins as a child sits in a chat room, then the suspects contact them. Not entrapment.There has to be interaction, or the sick **** wouldn't know where to go to get arrested. And the interaction must have been along the lines of "come and get me" or the sick **** wouldn't have made the effort.Maybe it doesn't fit the CURRENT legal definition of entrapment, as the cases would all get tossed if it did. It fits MY definition however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DELdaBull Posted June 26, 2011 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 17,061 Reputation: 1,429 Days Won: 19 Joined: 09/15/2005 Share Posted June 26, 2011 I'm a little lost here cause I like to holla at females in the flesh, not over cyber space.But, if I were in a "chatroom" and the person I was chatting with told me they were 14, our chat would be over. That's just me though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted June 29, 2011 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted June 29, 2011 No interaction between the cop in the bushes and the person who is ALREADY breaking the lawvs.Someone who is not breaking a law being enticed to do so by an LEO so they can be arrested.Big difference.the way these stings work is a Cop who is posins as a child sits in a chat room, then the suspects contact them. Not entrapment.There has to be interaction, or the sick **** wouldn't know where to go to get arrested. And the interaction must have been along the lines of "come and get me" or the sick **** wouldn't have made the effort.Maybe it doesn't fit the CURRENT legal definition of entrapment, as the cases would all get tossed if it did. It fits MY definition however.I'm really glad you didn't write the laws, otherwise it seems a lot of predators and criminals would be roaming free on technicalities. The pervs, if they weren't talking to LEOs, would be talking to kids. So I'm glad they're doing what they are doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Blingstein Posted June 30, 2011 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 3,084 Reputation: 30 Days Won: 2 Joined: 04/21/2008 Share Posted June 30, 2011 http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2011/06/30/to-catch-predator-host-caught-cheating/our buddy Chris Hansen isnt so morally correct himself. Cheating on your wife with a 30 year old is better than banging 9 year old boys and girls but still immoral. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted June 30, 2011 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted June 30, 2011 http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2011/06/30/to-catch-predator-host-caught-cheating/our buddy Chris Hansen isnt so morally correct himself. Cheating on your wife with a 30 year old is better than banging 9 year old boys and girls but still immoral. Looks like there is some conflicting statements in that article. Who freakin' knows ... who freakin' cares. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.