Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

NCAA to expand March Madness from 65 to 68 teams


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  6,502
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  10/27/2003

If this has been posted earlier I apologize

INDIANAPOLIS - The NCAA plans to expand the men's basketball tournament from 65 to 68 teams beginning next year and announced a new, $10.8 billion broadcasting deal with CBS and Turner Broadcasting on Thursday that will allow every game to be shown live for the first time.

"This is an important day for intercollegiate athletics and the 400,000 student-athletes who compete in NCAA sports," interim NCAA president Jim Isch said. "This agreement will provide on average more than $740 million annually to our conferences and member schools."

The men's tournament last expanded in 2001, adding one team to the 64-team field that was set in 1985. Talk of tweaking March Madness again generated a lot of chatter from fans worried about watering down the competition and those fearing the additional bracket guesswork involved in predicting a winner.

http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/36715263/ns/sports-college_basketball/

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  74,650
  • Reputation:   10,880
  • Days Won:  424
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

So the NCAA isn't as clueless as I thought .... Great move only going to 68 and just as great move televising all the games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  247
  • Reputation:   6
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/29/2009

This makes me a lot happier than the 96 they proposed earlier. I really didn't want that happening

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  7,796
  • Reputation:   160
  • Days Won:  6
  • Joined:  06/08/2006

Glad that its not the 96, but this is just stupid.  We now have 4 play in games, which no one cares about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  1,251
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/21/2007

Glad that its not the 96, but this is just stupid.  We now have 4 play in games, which no one cares about.

is it really that big of a deal? u should be ecstatic its not 96 teams....i know i am

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  19,229
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  01/14/2002

Those 4 teams care about those 4 play-in games.

I have no problem with this.  68 makes WAY more sense than 65. 

All the #1's should have the same scenario... playing a play-in winner.

Right now, 3 of them get rested opponents and one gets a less rested one.

This is a very logical change.

The tv deal is more important than the extra teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  66,091
  • Reputation:   2,434
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  01/01/2001

the economy must be good

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.