BULLO12 Posted April 22, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 6,502 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/27/2003 Share Posted April 22, 2010 If this has been posted earlier I apologizeINDIANAPOLIS - The NCAA plans to expand the men's basketball tournament from 65 to 68 teams beginning next year and announced a new, $10.8 billion broadcasting deal with CBS and Turner Broadcasting on Thursday that will allow every game to be shown live for the first time."This is an important day for intercollegiate athletics and the 400,000 student-athletes who compete in NCAA sports," interim NCAA president Jim Isch said. "This agreement will provide on average more than $740 million annually to our conferences and member schools."The men's tournament last expanded in 2001, adding one team to the 64-team field that was set in 1985. Talk of tweaking March Madness again generated a lot of chatter from fans worried about watering down the competition and those fearing the additional bracket guesswork involved in predicting a winner.http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/36715263/ns/sports-college_basketball/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted April 22, 2010 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 74,650 Reputation: 10,880 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted April 22, 2010 So the NCAA isn't as clueless as I thought .... Great move only going to 68 and just as great move televising all the games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
South_Florida_Flip Posted April 22, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 10,565 Reputation: 93 Days Won: 7 Joined: 05/14/2005 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Very good news and the right move if they were hell bent on expanding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullgrad10 Posted April 22, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 247 Reputation: 6 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted April 22, 2010 This makes me a lot happier than the 96 they proposed earlier. I really didn't want that happening Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outrunner Posted April 22, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 7,796 Reputation: 160 Days Won: 6 Joined: 06/08/2006 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Glad that its not the 96, but this is just stupid. We now have 4 play in games, which no one cares about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IHuckItDeep Posted April 22, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 1,251 Reputation: 7 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/21/2007 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Glad that its not the 96, but this is just stupid. We now have 4 play in games, which no one cares about.is it really that big of a deal? u should be ecstatic its not 96 teams....i know i am Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velcro Posted April 22, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,229 Reputation: 7 Days Won: 1 Joined: 01/14/2002 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Those 4 teams care about those 4 play-in games.I have no problem with this. 68 makes WAY more sense than 65. All the #1's should have the same scenario... playing a play-in winner.Right now, 3 of them get rested opponents and one gets a less rested one.This is a very logical change.The tv deal is more important than the extra teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted April 23, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted April 23, 2010 the economy must be good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.