Guest hm101 Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 maryland. they could actually win some conference games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SRQ Posted October 8, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 4,879 Reputation: 24 Days Won: 0 Joined: 04/14/2006 Share Posted October 8, 2009 SRQ,the ACC contract is A LOT more than the Big East contract.Joe, ya got any hard numbers? If theirconytacy were for $120M & BEwas $70M, seems a LOT. Butnot per team & with a shift right before the next contract of a goodmedia area school, could come a LOT closer quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted October 8, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 10,251 Reputation: 270 Days Won: 14 Joined: 08/16/2005 Share Posted October 8, 2009 I'll get them later when I get to a comp, but I believe the football and basketball contract for the ACC was around 90-100 mil a year, whereas the football/basketball contract of the Big East is 60 mil a year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cophbulls Posted October 8, 2009 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 3,175 Reputation: 382 Days Won: 12 Joined: 08/30/2004 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Hey thanks for this, good info and interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cophbulls Posted October 8, 2009 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 3,175 Reputation: 382 Days Won: 12 Joined: 08/30/2004 Share Posted October 8, 2009 I wonder how the breakout is at a team level. I don't think it would be fair if Cincy got the same as USF so I imagine they didn't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redfisher78 Posted October 8, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 1,757 Reputation: 12 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/20/2007 Share Posted October 8, 2009 maryland. they could actually win some conference games. Yeah they would be a great addition, would have made us look ridiculous this year. Blown out by Cal, taken to overtime by FCS James Madison, and lost to Middle Tennessee State. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted October 8, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 10,251 Reputation: 270 Days Won: 14 Joined: 08/16/2005 Share Posted October 8, 2009 SRQ,Numbers wise:ACC Football 38 million perACC Basketball around 60 million per yearBig East Football 13.3 million per (80 Mil over 6 years)Big East basketball around 50 million per year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jihme Posted October 8, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 4,642 Reputation: 9 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/09/2006 Share Posted October 8, 2009 what's the breakdown for WITHIN the BE? (assuming one BCS bowl) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
80mins Posted October 8, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 2,363 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/30/2005 Share Posted October 8, 2009 SRQ,Numbers wise:ACC Football 38 million perACC Basketball around 60 million per yearBig East Football 13.3 million per (80 Mil over 6 years)Big East basketball around 50 million per yearWhich means: ACC-98mil/12= 8.167million per school.Big East-13.3mil/8 + 50mil/16 = 4.788million per school. (that's simple math; I don't know to what degree basketball only schools get in on football revenue sharing) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cow Pie Posted October 8, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 7,693 Reputation: 35 Days Won: 2 Joined: 09/04/2008 Share Posted October 8, 2009 TV contracts go up or go down based on the following figures:1.) Ratings, people have to be interested enough to watch2.) Total number of teams... the more teams the more games on tv, which means more sponsors or more lucrative sponsors and if you throw in a title game then it only adds to the tv money coming in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.