RMF5630 Posted November 10, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 4 Content Count: 125 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/26/2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 I find it interesting that the "power conferences" created this disaster called the BCS for their own interests. Now, when it appears that it is working against them they want to change the rules mid-stream. An undefeated Rutgers should get a shot against an undefeated OSU or Michigan, if they are the only two BCS conference champs left. If Tennessee doesn't like it, don't lose. UT lost two games, they are not in the conversation at all.If the college football world does not think the Big East is champion caliber kick them out. But, for the next 2 years the BE is a BCS conference and should be treated with the respect the othes get. Why should the loser of OSU/Mich get another shot? Why should Texas get another shot if OSU wins out? They had their shot and lost. At the very least there should be no re-matches in the NC game, period. I think it is good to see some new blood take a shot at the NC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apis Bull Posted November 10, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,586 Content Count: 23,185 Reputation: 2,332 Days Won: 65 Joined: 09/05/2002 Share Posted November 10, 2006 because we don't live in the green and gold world anymore, we have an outside perspective which makes us anti-USF and USC and UT supporters only, respectivelyDude, while I know you support USF somewhat, look at your avatar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdgukhsdgl Posted November 10, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 287 Content Count: 3,078 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/18/2002 Share Posted November 10, 2006 An undefeated Rutgers should get a shot against an undefeated OSU or Michigan, if they are the only two BCS conference champs left. If Tennessee doesn't like it, don't lose. UT lost two games, they are not in the conversation at all.who said they were? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdgukhsdgl Posted November 10, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 287 Content Count: 3,078 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/18/2002 Share Posted November 10, 2006 because we don't live in the green and gold world anymore, we have an outside perspective which makes us anti-USF and USC and UT supporters only, respectivelyDude, while I know you support USF somewhat, look at your avatar. Yes, it is UT. I attend UT. I am a USF alumnus. I support them both, in fact, I just took off my USF hat five minuted ago when I got home from class (do I really have to play this support game again?). Until someone comes up with a USF/UT avatar (surprisngly they don't exist on the internet), I choose to have UT stuff up for now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apis Bull Posted November 10, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,586 Content Count: 23,185 Reputation: 2,332 Days Won: 65 Joined: 09/05/2002 Share Posted November 10, 2006 My point is you have an SEC bias. I never said that you don't support USF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull Dozer Posted November 10, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 343 Content Count: 13,697 Reputation: 2,041 Days Won: 45 Joined: 09/04/2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 Yes everyone but fans of teams in the BE have a SEC bias this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dabull80 Posted November 10, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 96 Content Count: 4,501 Reputation: 93 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/25/2001 Share Posted November 10, 2006 Yes everyone but fans of teams in the BE have a SEC bias this year. Everyone but all the alumni,players,coaches and fans of the PAC 10,Big 10 and Big 12. I doubt the ACC is doing much talking this year. Trust me, I lived up north for many years and Big 10 fans always thought the SEC was over-rated. Just called normal conference bias. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullDoug Posted November 10, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 469 Content Count: 4,451 Reputation: 52 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/27/2001 Share Posted November 10, 2006 RockyTop...we know where your heart is though.  This is a USF Bull message board.  Not a UT/SEC board.  Do you wear UT gear to USF games?  If you wear USF gear to UT games well then I think you may be a confused individual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdgukhsdgl Posted November 10, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 287 Content Count: 3,078 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/18/2002 Share Posted November 10, 2006 guess i should have actually read what he wrote first... see below Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull Dozer Posted November 10, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 343 Content Count: 13,697 Reputation: 2,041 Days Won: 45 Joined: 09/04/2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 RockyTop...we know where your heart is though.  This is a USF Bull message board.  Not a UT/SEC board.  Do you wear UT gear to USF games?  If you wear USF gear to UT games well then I think you may be a confused individual.what the hell are you even talking about? why would I wear UT stuff to a USF game and vice versa?He's equating your UT avatar at a USF board to you wearing USF gear at UT game.  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now