Replacements for Jeff Scott

[Brad]

Yes, it was divided about 101/4

Those few dividers, most of whose names you should know, splintered off into their embrace with McMurphy.  

[Who'sYourData?]

Just now, BullyPulpit said:

IMO, because a few players were whiny, soft, participation trophy ******* and couldn't take actually having to compete and bust their asses to achieve something. Also, because the administration was trying to undermine him throughout the ordeal. 

In your opinion.  I see.

Couldn't be because he wanted them to lie to save his job or anything like that.

[Brad]

6 minutes ago, Dave_Glaser said:

That Jim is a "jackass" isn't really debatable. 

But he's our jackass. 

 

Fair enough.  We've discussed.  I never saw that side of him, but I wasn't around him as much as you and apparently the Data guy.  

[Who'sYourData?]

Just now, Brad said:

Yes, it was divided about 101/4

Those few dividers, most of whose names you should know, splintered off into their embrace with McMurphy.  

Right.

You were dealing with major life issues at the time and half a continent away.  But you know.

Or maybe you just heard from those you wanted to hear from.  

But let's move on, right?

[Brad]

7 minutes ago, Who'sYourData? said:

Right.

You were dealing with major life issues at the time and half a continent away.  But you know.

Or maybe you just heard from those you wanted to hear from.  

But let's move on, right?

No let's stay on this.  I went back yesterday and read all the emails I had from reporters, USF personnel and players that reached out, both current and former.  So no, not just what I wanted, but what people wanted to say.  Including a co-conspirator and a Joel acquaintance.  Where's your info from?  Feelings?

[Who'sYourData?]

Just now, Brad said:

No let's stay on this.  I went back yesterday and read all the emails I had from reporters, USF personnel and players that reached out, both current and former.  So no, not just what I wanted, but what people wanted me to know.  What's your source?  Feelings?

USF players and personnel.  But you are always right, as usual.  It's your board, you control the narrative.  So be it.

So let's see who the next head coach is and talk about that. 

[Brad]

You're invited to share your information.  There's no narrative control.  It's a good idea to provide some substance if you say you have it.

[Rocky Style]

4 minutes ago, Who'sYourData? said:

So let's see who the next head coach is and talk about that. 

I suspect we will definitely talk about that!

[zarnozdabull]

24 minutes ago, Dave_Glaser said:

That Jim is a "jackass" isn't really debatable. 

But he's our jackass. 

 

Some actually believe this guy was incapable of being an untouchable hothead. 

[Mission9]

3 hours ago, DontPushMe said:

We should save some money by having no coach. Coach just by letting people on this forum vote on decisions in a poll. 

Every week we auction off the right to be the person standing on the sideline reading out the decisions made by this poll. 

Let interns recruit. 

This set up would likely perform better than Scott Jeff did 

I will agree with this if we skip the auction and choose the person for the sidelines  who can emulate a caricature of the great Vince Lombardi. The great Lombardi  with glasses, suit, fedora hat and throughout the game barking out "What the hell's going on out here?"  and "Grab, grab, grab, nobody's tackling!"