sdgukhsdgl Posted October 15, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 287 Content Count: 3,078 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/18/2002 Share Posted October 15, 2005 The OL just dominated the first 4 games, was respectable against UM, but was nothing special today against a bad Pitt DL. The OL should have been making holes big enough for Andre to walk through. Pitt was a team giving up 160yds/game on the ground and we cant run on them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted October 16, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,895 Content Count: 66,073 Reputation: 2,431 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted October 16, 2005 they met tougher players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulls 1 Posted October 16, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 63 Content Count: 551 Reputation: 26 Days Won: 1 Joined: 10/31/2002 Share Posted October 16, 2005 No they figured that PJ could not hurt them so there were 8 men in the box most of the time.  Can you say ONE DIMENSIONAL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulls96go Posted October 16, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 724 Content Count: 10,219 Reputation: 2 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/17/2002 Share Posted October 16, 2005 a bad game will come sometime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizarvexis Posted October 16, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 164 Content Count: 1,386 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/25/2001 Share Posted October 16, 2005 No they figured that PJ could not hurt them so there were 8 men in the box most of the time.  Can you say ONE DIMENSIONAL?Yep, and unless one of the QB's steps up and the WR start catching what is thrown at them, the Bulls will struggle to win. It's looking like the road Bulls will mostly lose and the home Bulls will mostly win, so 5-6 is the probable season record unless something changes.Kizarvexis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
namuh-bull Posted October 16, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 15 Content Count: 1,235 Reputation: 107 Days Won: 1 Joined: 07/23/2003 Share Posted October 16, 2005 It could be that we startted thinking we were stonger, faster, and better than everybody else and wouldn't have much of a problem winning against the "inferior" team. I hope that it has been beaten into the guys that they can and probably will get their tails kicked by any team in the conference if we don't prepare for a hard fought game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullsmania Posted October 16, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 151 Content Count: 2,719 Reputation: 31 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/23/2001 Share Posted October 16, 2005 Forget about the holes, what about the 5 sacks and 9 over the last two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull Matrix Posted October 16, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 601 Content Count: 16,336 Reputation: 2,866 Days Won: 43 Joined: 01/04/2003 Share Posted October 16, 2005 Either Pitt got real good on defense or that USF had a very bad game coming out of the bye week. Hall did all he could with little help in that game. Julmiste has no touch on his passes and keeps over throwing his WRs. Also, there were a lot of coverage sacks according to the announcers. Julmiste had time to throw it, he just could not find any open WRs. Pitt has some good DBs on that team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cubanbull Posted October 16, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 295 Content Count: 6,814 Reputation: 1,083 Days Won: 22 Joined: 12/23/2001 Share Posted October 16, 2005 Lets see they stuffed the line with 8 guys to stop the run, because they werent afraid of getting burned by our passing game and then once they had a lead and we were forced to pass theycame out after us. In both cases they only had to worry about one thing.Get ready for WV to do the samething next weekend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdgukhsdgl Posted October 16, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 287 Content Count: 3,078 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/18/2002 Author Share Posted October 16, 2005 Forget about the holes, what about the 5 sacks and 9 over the last two.a lot of the sacks can be attributed to our passing system being terrible. If you have 4-5 WR's go out, there has be at least one guy open. most of the sacks were "coverage" sacks. PJ had time, dropped back, looked around, saw nothing, then got sacked. Not sure if nobody was open or if PJ just cant see them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now