cmhatter Posted May 6, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 8,174 Reputation: 268 Days Won: 6 Joined: 09/02/2007 Share Posted May 6, 2010 if usf felt like they had nothing to stand on this would have been over a long time ago...if USF had any doubt they woulda paid him his full salary and moved on to save any potential embarrassment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted May 6, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted May 6, 2010 USF has offered no settlement whatsoever because this is all about not paying a settlement which is the point I just made earlier.Right, Leavitt would take a settlement. Just like you said earlier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted May 6, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted May 6, 2010 i would have fired leavitt immediately upon confirming he hit the kidwoolard showing restraint and patience did his due diligenceAre you sure the report confirms that? If so, why won't they release it in its entirety?Of course you know the answer, but you're just being a troll.i read entire report fool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted May 6, 2010 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 74,738 Reputation: 10,964 Days Won: 425 Joined: 11/25/2005 Author Share Posted May 6, 2010 if usf felt like they had nothing to stand on this would have been over a long time ago...if USF had any doubt they woulda paid him his full salary and moved on to save any potential embarrassment.If they had a LOT of doubt they would have paid him and moved on ... With just any doubt, it's like "What the hell, let's just roll the dice and see how it plays out". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted May 6, 2010 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 74,738 Reputation: 10,964 Days Won: 425 Joined: 11/25/2005 Author Share Posted May 6, 2010 if usf felt like they had nothing to stand on this would have been over a long time ago...if USF had any doubt they woulda paid him his full salary and moved on to save any potential embarrassment.If they had a LOT of doubt they would have paid him and moved on ... With just any doubt, it's like "What the hell, let's just roll the dice and see how it plays out".Have you ever heard of this thing called The Peter Principle?Yes ... and it has nothing to do with this situation ... but thanks for your input and have a nice day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull-by-Marriage Posted May 6, 2010 Group: Bull Backers Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 4,741 Reputation: 127 Days Won: 3 Joined: 02/25/2004 Share Posted May 6, 2010 if usf felt like they had nothing to stand on this would have been over a long time ago...if USF had any doubt they woulda paid him his full salary and moved on to save any potential embarrassment.If they had a LOT of doubt they would have paid him and moved on ... With just any doubt, it's like "What the hell, let's just roll the dice and see how it plays out".Also, keep in mind Doug Woolard has never been the Director of Athletics at a university with a football program. Have you ever heard of this thing called The Peter Principle?NOTE: Just pointing out mizzou's hypocrisy. I have no way to affect the outcome, and I think that it's been beat to death.Mizzou, could one not say the "Peter Principle" applies(d) to leavitt?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted May 6, 2010 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 74,738 Reputation: 10,964 Days Won: 425 Joined: 11/25/2005 Author Share Posted May 6, 2010 if usf felt like they had nothing to stand on this would have been over a long time ago...if USF had any doubt they woulda paid him his full salary and moved on to save any potential embarrassment.If they had a LOT of doubt they would have paid him and moved on ... With just any doubt, it's like "What the hell, let's just roll the dice and see how it plays out".Have you ever heard of this thing called The Peter Principle?Yes ... and it has nothing to do with this situation ... but thanks for your input and have a nice day.How does it not? Are you sure an inexperienced AD made the right decisions?Just to play along a little longer .... Inexperienced does not equal incompetent, the principle behind the Peter Principle ... and just how many AD's DO have experience with a situation like this? DW has shown nothing that would indicate incompetence at the level he's at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted May 6, 2010 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 74,738 Reputation: 10,964 Days Won: 425 Joined: 11/25/2005 Author Share Posted May 6, 2010 if usf felt like they had nothing to stand on this would have been over a long time ago...if USF had any doubt they woulda paid him his full salary and moved on to save any potential embarrassment.If they had a LOT of doubt they would have paid him and moved on ... With just any doubt, it's like "What the hell, let's just roll the dice and see how it plays out".Also, keep in mind Doug Woolard has never been the Director of Athletics at a university with a football program. Have you ever heard of this thing called The Peter Principle?Mizzou, could one not say the "Peter Principle" applies(d) to leavitt??Hmmm .... interesting concept considering he did bring up this whole PP thing to begin with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull-by-Marriage Posted May 6, 2010 Group: Bull Backers Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 4,741 Reputation: 127 Days Won: 3 Joined: 02/25/2004 Share Posted May 6, 2010 if usf felt like they had nothing to stand on this would have been over a long time ago...if USF had any doubt they woulda paid him his full salary and moved on to save any potential embarrassment.If they had a LOT of doubt they would have paid him and moved on ... With just any doubt, it's like "What the hell, let's just roll the dice and see how it plays out".Also, keep in mind Doug Woolard has never been the Director of Athletics at a university with a football program. Have you ever heard of this thing called The Peter Principle?NOTE: Just pointing out mizzou's hypocrisy. I have no way to affect the outcome, and I think that it's been beat to death.Mizzou, could one not say the "Peter Principle" applies(d) to leavitt??Short answer...NO!See recent NFL Draft for reference.Isn't Woolard the Athletic Director, therefore he should be given credit for draft pics as well, right? More to the point, the fact the we had so many drafted, yet did not win a conference title, or even sniff one last year would speak to the level of the coaching. Again, I don't really have a dog in this fight, but I truly can't stand hypocrisy from anyone, in any situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted May 6, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted May 6, 2010 I'd say you're viewing the incident through a very biased and small prism. Why of course you are. Oh, were you talking about someone else, friend of Leavitt? : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.