SANJAY Posted October 1, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 7,993 Reputation: 968 Days Won: 21 Joined: 10/31/2005 Share Posted October 1, 2009 Apparently, there is no scout team. Interesting tidbit below. I guess an old dog can learn a new trick or two. Stuff like this along with the new coordinators give me hope that we can avoid what happened the last 2 years. You want to make the South Florida scout team? Too bad -- coach Jim Leavitt eliminated it this season. Leavitt said it’s hard to get enough talent to give your starters a true-to-life picture of the opponent. He also said that watching scout team video is a sure cure for insomnia. On a tip he got during a ball-talking visit earlier this year with Washington coach Steve Sarkisian, Leavitt has his second team do the scout-team work and run the opponent’s stuff against the starters. If it works, you’ll see a lot of coaches eliminate scout teams. http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/8788/three-point-stance-scrapping-the-scout-team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DELdaBull Posted October 1, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 17,061 Reputation: 1,429 Days Won: 19 Joined: 09/15/2005 Share Posted October 1, 2009 So,That basically means we always go ones vs twos instead of 3s. This means we build depth because the 2s play against real 1-A BCS starters and the 1s stay sharp because the people they are scrimmaging against have real talent. I like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FazaUSF Posted October 1, 2009 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 2,305 Reputation: 670 Days Won: 11 Joined: 09/15/2005 Share Posted October 1, 2009 Um, I don't understand why this hasn't always been the case. I thought the scout team DID mean the 2nd team. Why the heck wouldn't it? That makes way too much sense for the majority of people NOT to have thought of it. I guess I was wrong! Glad it got "fixed" though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobulls83 Posted October 1, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 3,475 Reputation: 95 Days Won: 7 Joined: 02/14/2006 Share Posted October 1, 2009 I don't really have an opinion on this, but there IS a downside. Having the second team act as the opponents in practice takes away from time they could be preparing for the opponents themselves. Who do the second-team players practice against? I don't see how this can't make the backups less prepared to enter the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NormalBull Posted October 1, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 1,797 Reputation: 1 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/20/2002 Share Posted October 1, 2009 Most teams do not want to risk their second teamers to injury when they go against the first teamers in practice. It can erode depth quickly. Also, and more importantly, most coaches want the second teamers to get reps against the other teams' offense and defense because they are an injury away from being on the field. While George Baker is learning Syracuse's defensive schemes and playing the role of Cuse CB, he is NOT practicing against the Cuse offense. If a CB gets hurt early in the game, George may not know OUR defensive approach because he was busy pretending to be a Cuse defender. That is why most teams use their scout players to simulate the other team.Normal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedGreenAndGold Posted October 1, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 1,027 Reputation: 11 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/30/2008 Share Posted October 1, 2009 Yes, the possibility for injury exists but I like the idea that both the first and second teams are actively engaged in the preparation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.