Velcro Posted April 21, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,229 Reputation: 7 Days Won: 1 Joined: 01/14/2002 Share Posted April 21, 2009 (in order of experience)PG Howard (sr) Leemow (so) Daniels (so) Crater (so) SG Jones (ju) Burwell (fr) Noriega (fr)SF Espinosa (so) Dumars (fr)PF Gilchrist (so) C Rivas (sr) Famous (ju)* 2 more scholarshipsStill seems a bit on the small side, but MUCH better than it was without Famous.Both Guard positions are pretty interchangeableAnd C and PF are pretty interchangeable. You could have a 3 guard, 2 forward (no center) set as Heath told Famous...or you could even have Gus as a SF and have big lineup.With the remaining scholarships, a SF and a C/PF would be great. If you can't get one of quality guys mentioned, hold 'em in your pocket for next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paisa el Toro Posted April 21, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 10,380 Reputation: 1,058 Days Won: 18 Joined: 08/11/2003 Share Posted April 21, 2009 Actually, I think Gilchrist plays more like a SF, and Espinosa is bit of an undersized PF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velcro Posted April 21, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,229 Reputation: 7 Days Won: 1 Joined: 01/14/2002 Author Share Posted April 21, 2009 probably true, to some extent. But I think defensively, i'd rather have espinosa guarding the 3 spot. He seems quicker laterally. Offensively, I do agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velcro Posted April 21, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,229 Reputation: 7 Days Won: 1 Joined: 01/14/2002 Author Share Posted April 21, 2009 and you can say Dumars is a shooting guard... but at 6'5 or 6'6, 230+, he's as heavy as gilchrist who is at least 3 inches taller (similar build to Zaronn Cann). I listed him as a SF due to his size... but from what I read, he has very good range and never hesitates to take open shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paisa el Toro Posted April 21, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 10,380 Reputation: 1,058 Days Won: 18 Joined: 08/11/2003 Share Posted April 21, 2009 I hope Dumars and Noriega are as lethal as reports make them out to be. We need some serious perimeter shooting help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velcro Posted April 21, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,229 Reputation: 7 Days Won: 1 Joined: 01/14/2002 Author Share Posted April 21, 2009 Burwell's offensive stats are gaudy as well. We need at least one of them to earn quality minutes knocking down perimeter shots. Hopefully a couple of them. Burwell has some slashing ability too, so he'd be a great guy to get solid contributions from.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The New "U" Posted April 21, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 219 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/04/2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 We'll be able to produce a good starting lineup. We need one of the wing players to immediately step in and we need Famous to be the real deal as well in order for it to work though. We're dangerously thin up front though; that's expected with a program like ours. Hopefully injuries/foul trouble won't be much of a problem for the big men. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velcro Posted April 21, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,229 Reputation: 7 Days Won: 1 Joined: 01/14/2002 Author Share Posted April 21, 2009 i think there is potential for exactly that... injuries and foul trouble to be a problem. That is why i hope we get Marcius AND another guy.Rivas still has iffy legs... although he ended the year playing very good solid ball for us. He also tends to give away a couple cheap fouls. The pieces are coming together though and the starting lineup is going to be decent. if we can get a rotation of 7 or 8 guys giving good minutes, there is certainly potential for a vast improvement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velcro Posted April 24, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,229 Reputation: 7 Days Won: 1 Joined: 01/14/2002 Author Share Posted April 24, 2009 Update now that Patrick signed:(in order of experience)PG Howard (sr) Leemow (so) Daniels (so) Crater (so) SG Jones (ju) Burwell (fr) Noriega (fr)SF Espinosa (so) Dumars (fr)PF Gilchrist (so) Fitzpatrick (fr)C Rivas (sr) Famous (ju)* 1 more scholarshipsFrom this, I can see this being our opening day lineup (assuming crater can't play until after finals in december)Pos Lineup PG Howard (Leemow, Crater*, Jones, Daniels)SG Jones (Howard, Noriega, Dumars, Burwell)SF Espinosa (Burwell, Fitzpatrick, Gilchrist)PF Gilchrist (Famous, Espinosa)C Famous (Rivas)an interesting combination would bePG Jones 6'4SG Burwell 6'6SF Gilchrist 6'10PF Famous 6'11C Rivas 6'10Quite a large lineup. But that is contingent on Burwell being the guy that steps up.If not, move Jones back to SG, put in Howard, and you still only lose 1 inch at PG, and 2 inches at SG.PG Howard 6'3SG Jones 6'4SF Gilchrist 6'10PF Famous 6'11C Rivas 6'10And that lineup has tremendous potential for scoring.Jones is obviously good for 18-20 ppg or more, based on his first 2 seasons.If Gilchrist gets any consistency in his game, he could be there for 15 ppg.Famous SHOULD get his points and rebounds, my guess 12 ppgHoward averaged over 10 last year thanks to his improved agressiveness and shooting touch, and recovered knee. I'd expect him to repeat that.And Rivas seems to get 7 or 8 pts just with his rebounding putbacks.So that lineup has roughly 57 pts avg potential on any given night.(and that is without any 3 pt specialists being in the lineup other than Jones who is Mr. everything - burwell, noriega, dumars) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruger7mmmag Posted April 24, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 2,523 Reputation: 14 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/08/2007 Share Posted April 24, 2009 Geez, with almost 3 seven footers, how could we not suck next year if they are even marginally talented? Crazy how tall these bball players are these days. Used to think if a team had one guy near 7 foot that was something, now every guy on the floor looks like a tree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.