smazza Posted February 3, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted February 3, 2008 Rk. School Commits Conf. Points Top100 Off. Def. Sp.T. H.S. J.C. Avg.Rat. Prv.Rk.* 1. Alabama 28 SEC 4504 3 2 15 9 11 16 1 27 1 3.61 1. 2. Notre Dame 22 I-A Ind 4420 7 4 14 4 11 11 0 22 0 4.00 2. 3. Georgia 24 SEC 4275 4 3 11 10 12 11 1 24 0 3.71 3. 4. Texas A&M 28 Big 12 3902 0 0 9 16 12 15 1 27 1 3.21 4. 5. Miami (Fl) 27 ACC 3875 5 3 4 16 11 15 1 26 1 3.22 5. 6. Florida State 25 ACC 3783 3 3 9 10 14 11 0 22 3 3.48 6. 7. LSU 24 SEC 3782 2 1 10 13 13 11 0 24 0 3.50 7. 8. Florida 22 SEC 3733 5 4 9 9 8 13 1 20 2 3.77 8. 9. UCLA 23 Pac-10 3725 4 2 11 10 13 9 1 22 1 3.65 9. 10. Washington 26 Pac-10 3613 2 1 7 14 17 9 0 26 0 3.19 10. 11. Oklahoma 20 Big 12 3545 8 3 11 5 10 9 1 17 3 3.80 11. 12. Texas 20 Big 12 3460 5 2 11 6 9 10 1 20 0 3.70 12. 13. Arizona State 27 Pac-10 3370 2 0 8 18 15 12 0 22 5 3.26 13. 14. Clemson 23 ACC 3322 2 1 7 11 10 11 2 22 1 3.22 14. 15. USC 17 Pac-10 3222 7 4 7 5 10 7 0 17 0 3.82 15. 16. Ohio State 17 Big Ten 3207 8 5 6 5 8 8 1 17 0 3.88 16. 17. Illinois 26 Big Ten 3178 1 0 6 15 15 11 0 25 1 3.04 17. 18. Michigan 19 Big Ten 3155 4 1 12 5 11 8 0 19 0 3.68 18. 19. Auburn 27 SEC 3125 0 1 4 14 14 13 0 25 2 2.89 19. 20. Virginia Tech 30 ACC 2904 2 0 4 16 14 16 0 30 0 2.80 20. 21. Pittsburgh 20 Big East 2878 3 3 4 10 13 6 1 18 2 3.35 21. 22. Boston College 27 ACC 2737 0 0 2 13 14 12 1 26 1 2.63 22. 23. Nebraska 23 Big 12 2656 1 1 2 13 12 11 0 21 2 2.83 23. 24. Minnesota 30 Big Ten 2623 0 0 7 12 13 17 0 24 6 2.87 24. 25. Wisconsin 23 Big Ten 2604 0 0 1 18 8 14 1 22 1 2.87 25 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puc86 Posted February 3, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,272 Reputation: 6,158 Days Won: 255 Joined: 10/13/2002 Share Posted February 3, 2008 What were we supposed to learn from that list?Rk. School Commits Conf. Points Top100 Off. Def. Sp.T. H.S. J.C. Avg.Rat. Prv.Rk.* Sucks1. Alabama 28 SEC 4504 3 2 15 9 11 16 1 27 1 3.61 1. Sucks2. Notre Dame 22 I-A Ind 4420 7 4 14 4 11 11 0 22 0 4.00 2. 3. Georgia 24 SEC 4275 4 3 11 10 12 11 1 24 0 3.71 3. Pretty Sucky4. Texas A&M 28 Big 12 3902 0 0 9 16 12 15 1 27 1 3.21 4. Sucks5. Miami (Fl) 27 ACC 3875 5 3 4 16 11 15 1 26 1 3.22 5. Pretty Sucky6. Florida State 25 ACC 3783 3 3 9 10 14 11 0 22 3 3.48 6. 7. LSU 24 SEC 3782 2 1 10 13 13 11 0 24 0 3.50 7. 8. Florida 22 SEC 3733 5 4 9 9 8 13 1 20 2 3.77 8. Pretty Sucky9. UCLA 23 Pac-10 3725 4 2 11 10 13 9 1 22 1 3.65 9. Sucks10. Washington 26 Pac-10 3613 2 1 7 14 17 9 0 26 0 3.19 10. 11. Oklahoma 20 Big 12 3545 8 3 11 5 10 9 1 17 3 3.80 11. 12. Texas 20 Big 12 3460 5 2 11 6 9 10 1 20 0 3.70 12. Average13. Arizona State 27 Pac-10 3370 2 0 8 18 15 12 0 22 5 3.26 13. Average14. Clemson 23 ACC 3322 2 1 7 11 10 11 2 22 1 3.22 14. 15. USC 17 Pac-10 3222 7 4 7 5 10 7 0 17 0 3.82 15. 16. Ohio State 17 Big Ten 3207 8 5 6 5 8 8 1 17 0 3.88 16. One good year17. Illinois 26 Big Ten 3178 1 0 6 15 15 11 0 25 1 3.04 17. Lost to a 1 AA team18. Michigan 19 Big Ten 3155 4 1 12 5 11 8 0 19 0 3.68 18. Lost to us19. Auburn 27 SEC 3125 0 1 4 14 14 13 0 25 2 2.89 19. 20. Virginia Tech 30 ACC 2904 2 0 4 16 14 16 0 30 0 2.80 20. Sucks21. Pittsburgh 20 Big East 2878 3 3 4 10 13 6 1 18 2 3.35 21. 22. Boston College 27 ACC 2737 0 0 2 13 14 12 1 26 1 2.63 22. Sucks23. Nebraska 23 Big 12 2656 1 1 2 13 12 11 0 21 2 2.83 23. Sucks24. Minnesota 30 Big Ten 2623 0 0 7 12 13 17 0 24 6 2.87 24. 25. Wisconsin 23 Big Ten 2604 0 0 1 18 8 14 1 22 1 2.87 25 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted February 3, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted February 3, 2008 What were we supposed to learn from that list? That Pittsburg can suck no matter how many "stars" they bring in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gridiron God Posted February 3, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 98 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/07/2008 Share Posted February 3, 2008 And that Notre Dame is ranked in the top five every year and still is not very good on the field. Thank you Mr. Mazza for proving my point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cygnus34 Posted February 3, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 1,741 Reputation: 1 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/26/2004 Share Posted February 3, 2008 You can not compare this years recruits with last years team record. You have to see what this classes record is in 3 & 4 years from now. In the case of Miami everyone knows their classes were dropping since 2002, this is the first class since that is in the top 10.There is one thing I do agree on and that is good coaching will make up for a lack of stars. On the other hand good coaching with lots of stars will be in the BCS games and National Championship games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SANJAY Posted February 3, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 7,993 Reputation: 968 Days Won: 21 Joined: 10/31/2005 Share Posted February 3, 2008 Miami's recruits may have dropped off the past few years, but they were always top-30, and had way more talent than most of the teams they lost to the last two years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puc86 Posted February 3, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,272 Reputation: 6,158 Days Won: 255 Joined: 10/13/2002 Share Posted February 3, 2008 Here is 2005 PROSPECT COMMITMENTS School TOTAL Commits Commits Commits Avg Stars Points 1 Southern Cal 20 4 11 5 3.95 2,631 2 Florida State 22 3 13 5 3.82 2,582 3 Oklahoma 27 2 14 10 3.63 2,441 4 Tennessee 27 1 16 9 3.63 2,403 5 Nebraska 30 2 11 12 3.33 2,178 6 Michigan 23 1 10 11 3.48 1,995 7 Miami-FL 17 2 11 3 3.82 1,976 8 Texas A&M 26 1 9 11 3.23 1,839 9 California 24 1 9 12 3.38 1,816 10 Georgia 19 0 11 8 3.58 1,814 11 Iowa 23 1 7 11 3.22 1,745 12 Ohio State 18 1 9 6 3.50 1,654 13 Auburn 21 1 7 10 3.19 1,596 14 Virginia Tech 25 1 5 14 3.08 1,581 15 Florida 18 0 8 9 3.39 1,467 16 Maryland 24 1 4 15 3.08 1,433 17 Clemson 25 0 6 15 3.08 1,431 18 Alabama 32 0 6 21 3.03 1,424 19 Virginia 22 1 5 12 3.14 1,417 20 Texas 15 0 9 6 3.60 1,409 21 Arizona 24 0 7 14 3.17 1,395 22 LSU 13 1 7 5 3.69 1,335 23 South Carolina 28 0 6 15 2.96 1,310 24 Arkansas 24 1 3 15 3.00 1,293 25 Penn State 19 2 2 10 3.05 1,152 and 2006School TOTAL Commits Commits Commits Avg Stars Points 1 Southern Cal 25 5 14 6 3.96 3,018 2 Florida 27 4 17 5 3.89 2,901 3 Florida State 31 2 18 10 3.68 2,703 4 Georgia 28 2 14 12 3.64 2,436 5 Texas 25 2 11 12 3.60 2,283 6 Penn State 24 1 14 8 3.63 2,241 7 LSU 25 2 12 11 3.64 2,238 8 Notre Dame 28 2 10 15 3.46 2,189 9 Oklahoma 28 1 13 14 3.54 2,180 10 Auburn 25 1 14 7 3.52 2,148 11 Alabama 23 2 10 11 3.61 2,127 12 Ohio State 20 2 8 10 3.60 2,000 13 Michigan 19 2 9 7 3.63 1,974 14 Miami-FL 22 0 11 8 3.36 1,785 15 Clemson 20 2 6 10 3.40 1,741 16 Ole Miss 30 2 7 15 3.17 1,718 17 UCLA 22 0 7 13 3.23 1,544 18 Arizona 25 1 6 17 3.28 1,530 19 California 20 0 9 8 3.30 1,512 20 Nebraska 22 1 5 15 3.27 1,432 21 Pittsburgh 26 0 7 14 3.08 1,412 22 Oklahoma State 29 0 6 18 3.03 1,330 23 Tennessee 22 1 4 13 3.09 1,245 24 South Carolina 24 0 6 14 3.08 1,236 25 Texas Tech 34 0 4 22 2.88 1,194 Pretty much the same teams and mix of success and lack there of, is it not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Bull Posted February 3, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 5,900 Reputation: 628 Days Won: 5 Joined: 09/02/2007 Share Posted February 3, 2008 So, chicken or egg?Are the players that FSU and Nebraska are bringing in really that good, or, are they ranked really high because FSU and Nebraska is recruiting them?Stars are stupid, it's a popularity contest. Consensus All-American George Selvie was 2 stars, thats all I need to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.