WWMJD Posted October 19, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 3,048 Reputation: 316 Days Won: 6 Joined: 11/24/2005 Share Posted October 19, 2007 You might also notice that Rutgers was continually replacing their on-field players with fresh backups... in a concerted, deliberate, balanced manner. They had fresh guys in there constantly, and I think that's part of why Grothe was sacked 7 times.Ironic because that is usually our way of playing fast, rested D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
planetgeorge Posted October 19, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 108 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/02/2007 Share Posted October 19, 2007 the refs said "we dont want you to get the chance to win and still be #2" with that offensive P.I. call.Not to mention the illegal forward pass call on the blocked FG. The more I see it/hear about it, it was not a forward pass. If anything he was changing hands, got hit from behind and the ball was fumbled forward. And then there was that ticky-tack late hit out of bounds call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DouBULL Posted October 19, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 282 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/05/2007 Share Posted October 19, 2007 They were unable to think of any way to stop the relentless blitzing when all I read leading up to the game was that due they would do? How about outlet passes to the flat or slants? How about HOT routes? I am no football guru and even I can tell you how to hurt an opponent who blitzes all the time. Yes, we were outcoached. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmhatter Posted October 19, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 8,174 Reputation: 268 Days Won: 6 Joined: 09/02/2007 Author Share Posted October 19, 2007 They were unable to think of any way to stop the relentless blitzing when all I read leading up to the game was that due they would do? How about outlet passes to the flat or slants? How about HOT routes? I am no football guru and even I can tell you how to hurt an opponent who blitzes all the time. Yes, we were outcoached. my point exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kastofsna Posted October 19, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 635 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/22/2007 Share Posted October 19, 2007 forget the fake field goals and punts, we didn't adjust at ALL at the half, and Rutgers did BIG time. 'nuff said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackice12 Posted October 19, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 1,777 Reputation: 139 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/20/2003 Share Posted October 19, 2007 In some areas you can say we were out coached in others maybe we were out played. Look at the stats: USF / Rutgers1st Downs 20 / 18 3rd down efficiency 2-14 / 6-16 (2 for 14 is not going to cut it, Rutgers converted some major 3rd down plays in the game)4th down efficiency 0-1 / 2-2 (2 -2 Trick Play after trick play)Schiano was willing to gamble and his gambles paid off. In some instances it helps to be aggressive. Although Schiano left the middle of the field exposed to apply pressure to Grothem USF only took advantage of it a few times. On two occaisions going to the middle reaped big benfits for the Bulls (pass to Hester for a TD and pass to Hill for the big play). I just can not figure out why USF did not go back to the middle of the field. Someone help me to understand. I need to sleep at night. I live in NJ and will be terroized by this for another 2 years until USF comes back here and beats RU in Piscataway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herman_Momart Posted October 19, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 1,911 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/14/2005 Share Posted October 19, 2007 Give the ball to Ray Rice 38 times, two trick plays that tricked us, blitz our qb all day with us not changing the game plan. thats the way to beat us, thats what their coach did. I would say, yes, we were outcoached. Even the top coaches get outcoached every once in a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
postmortem Posted October 19, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 743 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/08/2007 Share Posted October 19, 2007 ya, but how did we not see the fake FG coming? My whole table at Champs said ""Watch for the fake"Even the fake punt I saw coming. Early in the game, decent place on the field, and other teams have shown they can have success against our special teams. The FG we were SCREAMING that a fake was coming.Everyones right about defending the blitz of 6. Where are slants and screen plays? those 6 guys are immediately out of the play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmhatter Posted October 19, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 8,174 Reputation: 268 Days Won: 6 Joined: 09/02/2007 Author Share Posted October 19, 2007 Give the ball to Ray Rice 38 times, two trick plays that tricked us, blitz our qb all day with us not changing the game plan. thats the way to beat us, thats what their coach did. I would say, yes, we were outcoached. Even the top coaches get outcoached every once in a while. no doubt about that! CJL IS USF FOOTBALL. He is a phenominal coach and I was him to get the liffetime deal but its happens occasionally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted October 19, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted October 19, 2007 were taken to school last nightteam not prepared for first fakethan team not prepared for second fakeno adjustments to all that blitzingno adjustment when rutgers rushed 2 lineman only-i only saw that when i was coaching pee wee football and my 5 guys were able to hold off 2 until a receiver got open-----WONDER WHY GROTHE COULDNT DO THAT!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.