we are ranked 61

[Jewbull]

At first I was surprised we were ranked so low, because we are located in one of the three best states to recurit athletes (Fla, TX, CA), and we are a BCS conference however the Big East is probably the 6th best conference in College Football therefore if your a recruit would you rather play for a bottom ACC, PAC 10, Big 10, Big 12, SEC, School or USF??

[SkypointBull]

These player rankings are mostly crap. Some kid that played at a small school in the middle of nowhere in kentucky  is better than a kid out of Miami that had less stats but against greater competition.

These ranking are determined by people in the state. I just look at who they offers from and that will tell if a kid is 4star, 3star, or 2 star.

plus our linebacking corp were 2 star recruits. And last time I checked, they are as good as anyone.

[dabull80]

Better then 62.

[ChiTownBull]

comes down to developing these kids into good college players

we know we can do this on the defensive side of the ball....now we need to prove we can do it on the off side as well.

[smazza]

you cant make a race horse out of a donkey

[smazza]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

comes down to developing these kids into good college players

LIKE WE DEVELOPED OUR QBS AND WRs

[sdgukhsdgl]

i guess it could be worse.... some people around here think the program should be folded and Fulmer is on thin ice with UT signing a 20-25th ranked class

this coming the year after UT signed the #1 class

[smazza]

ut knows about high expectations

no such problem at usf

[Guest BullsRock]

Too bad about UT, but honestly, I could give a rats A_S about their program or coach Fulmer. It's all about USF on the Bullspen!

[D1DDY]

i have been exercising alot lately so i have less hot air

diddy- i can do a better job than leavitt

i'm just playing with you man... you're a realist and it's a good trait to have.  We dreamers gotta pick on you sometime.