To those asking what happened to the D, they went into a prevent around the middle of the 3rd (not coincidentally right before Cinci started scoring) and were intending to give Cinci short plays trying to let them run out the clock. You saw the aggressive alignment come back each time Cinci worked their way back around our 30 - sometimes we stopped them, sometimes we didn't. I think what didn't work as well as might have been planned is that Cinci was very efficient when given time and space - rather than grinding to work their way down the field with multiple plays per first down, they were getting first downs in 1-2 plays the whole way.
As far as offense, there was a game plan change that also would have affected the defense. Prior to going up multiple possessions on Cinci, Taggart's response to Cinci stacking the box was with quick hits on slants and crossing routes that were moving the ball effectively. Once we went up on them and changed the game plan to burn the clock (conservatively running on most plays), we couldn't convert on 3rd downs and ended up handing the ball right back. This probably started to gas the D and gave Cinci the extra time they wanted.
To make a long story short I think the second half of this game, outside of Cinci moving the ball a little too well, played out exactly as planned despite looking like Cinci started to dominate the second half of the game.
On a side note, Eveld did take the offense down the field throwing strikes and fired a perfect touchdown pass to Hopkins that was dropped, so there is some promise to this offense if just a couple more things click. That was also the same pace/plays/execution that finally lead to some scores in the Miami game. I think we're starting to see the foundation of the offense (successful mixing of both the run and pass game) that they will continue to build on for the rest of the year.