So Let Me See If I Have The "Logic" Correct...

[Plantation Pete]

The vast majority of the people on this board want the same guy that made the decision to fire Leavitt and then in turn made the decision to hire Holtz, wants this very same guy to fire Holtz and then make yet another hiring decision?

Do I have the "logic" correct here?

Does anyone else see a problem with this picture?

[GaUSFBull]

FU and GTFO this board, please.

[Blackice12]

You make the assumption that Woolard and Genshaft made the decision to fire Leavitt.

[Plantation Pete]

You make the assumption that Woolard and Genshaft made the decision to fire Leavitt.

LOL! It's not an assumption, it's a cold hard fact.

[Plantation Pete]

FU and GTFO this board, please.

Having a bad day, are you?

[cmhatter]

again, jim got himself fired i think you know that.

judy looked him in the eyes and asked him to come clean and he said nothing happened.

gone

[cmhatter]

but anyways yes. he should be fired.

Jim didn't get fired on performance.

skip just isn't a good coach.

[Plantation Pete]

again, jim got himself fired i think you know that.

judy looked him in the eyes and asked him to come clean and he said nothing happened.

gone

No, you are incorrect.

At no time during the entire ordeal was Leavitt ever asked what happened. Judy the Grand Inquisitor offered him an opportunity to admit his sins just before execution.

.

.

.

.

Edited October 7, 2012 by Plantation Pete