Buller64 Posted August 23, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 2,016 Reputation: 165 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/25/2006 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Here is a month by month record of the Bulls (Nov. and Dec. combined).September (total) Wins - 32Losses - 16OctoberWins - 24Losses - 20Nov. and Dec.Wins - 30Losses - 14BowlsWins - 2Losses - 2Since joining the BE [C-USA in brackets]SeptemberWins - 15 [4]Losses - 3 [2]OctoberWins - 5 [3]Losses - 8 [5]Nov. and Dec.Wins - 10 [4]Losses - 6 [4]As we can see the team has a real hard time winning in October (when the BE conference begins). On the plus side though, the team does come back and play well in November. This was also true in C-USA. An interesting point, most of the Nov. and Dec. losses were in the first week of November (October hangover?).Question: Are the October results because of the OOC schedule or from a lack of depth?I think it is primarily because of the lack of depth. Overall the OOC has been very soild. The injury situation would be reflected by a strong September, when the team is healthy. Then troubles in October as the injuries begin to mount up (the back-ups are not as good as the starters). Then when the injuries begin to heal in November, the teams injuries begins to play better as starters return.Will the Bulls buck that trend this year?I don't think so. The team still doesn't have the high level of backups needed in the O-line and D-line. So I would expect the Bulls to have a great September and then struggle through the BE once again, and once again the problems will be in October. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outrunner Posted August 24, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 7,796 Reputation: 160 Days Won: 6 Joined: 06/08/2006 Share Posted August 24, 2009 great breakdownlooking at this season,Oct 03 @ SyracuseOct 10 OFF WEEKOct 15 CincinnatiOct 24 @ PittsburghOct 30 West VirginiaNov 07 OFF WEEKI think this schedule favors the bulls to "buck that trend". Cuse should be a lock for a win.With 12 days to prepare for Cincinnati and home field advantage, I give us a 65-35 chance. Then again, it is a Thursday night.On the road at Pittsburgh is the one game in October that really concerns me. We are not a great road, but having 9 days should help.West Virgina. Rivalry atmosphere at RayJ. Friday night lights. Halloween weekend. We'll be ready play.3-1 best case2-2 most likely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 The issue is preparation... USF's schedule only includes FSU as real prep.Cincinnati plays @ Oregon State and Fresno State... They also have a bye week before playing us... Pittsburgh plays @ NC State, L'ville, U Conn, @ Rutgers... part of 7 straight games without a week off. And USF only has one more day to prep (Rutgers is a Fri game for the Panthers). West Virginia plays Auburn and Colorado... of the three, the Mountaineers will be the least prepared before we face them...I can see these three games being the "mid season swoon"... if USF can start with a win over Cincy, we could avoid our Black October. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobulls83 Posted August 24, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 3,475 Reputation: 95 Days Won: 7 Joined: 02/14/2006 Share Posted August 24, 2009 I can see these three games being the "mid season swoon"... if USF can start with a win over Cincy, we could avoid our Black October.Yeah while depth was obviously the primary issue, I think momentum or whatever the appropriate word is had a lot to do with the past two Octobers. The losses to Pitt in 2008 and especially Rutgers in 2007 really deflated the team. The situation seems favorable going into the Tressey Bowl, so hopefully the Bulls can begin their crucial Big East stretch this year with a confidence-booster instead of the start of a freefall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleacherBull Posted August 24, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 971 Reputation: 3 Days Won: 0 Joined: 03/14/2002 Share Posted August 24, 2009 The team still doesn't have the high level of backups needed in the O-line and D-line. I didn't think D-line depth was supposed to be a problem this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carolina_Bull Posted August 24, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 2,213 Reputation: 69 Days Won: 3 Joined: 11/26/2006 Share Posted August 24, 2009 Last season's schedule was a travesty. . . . . . . seriously, from a logistics standpoint (as logistics applies to end-performance), it was probably one of the three worst schedules in college football.(1) Two early bye weeks (didn't we have an 18 day layoff at one point),(2) Serving as the villain and ending the UCF series on the road (IMO, we won the game but lost our mojo),(3) Serving as inaugural visitor for a stadium opening at FIU,(4) Playing two road games in five days,(5) Hosting a poorly attended sunday night game played the same day as a Rays playoff game, and(6) Playing visitor in WV for their emotional send-off of Pat White in the snow.It seemed like the 2008 schedule was had no flow (athletes love to adhere to routines) and starts and that almost every road game had a back story that had nothing to do with football.One of my biggest reasons for hope this year is the fact our schedule is not such a clusterf*ck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinRicky Posted August 24, 2009 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 22,703 Reputation: 5,836 Days Won: 108 Joined: 09/13/2007 Share Posted August 24, 2009 I would contribute the October swoon to injuries/depth. Will it improve this year? Depends on injuries and the positions of those injured. OLine is always a fear but I'm afraid this year an injury to a linebacker could be disastrous. If we stay injury free, we should be fine in October, meaning 3 - 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.