Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

now thAT USF is so bad will it help or hurt


smazza

Recommended Posts

Since USF isn't targeting a bevy of 5-Stars, it might not be too bad.

I always feel like ~3.5 star style players care about playing time, and the way USF has performed I feel like a lot of kids feel that they would have a shot immediately. If all Josh Robinson really needs is a feeling he can play right away, he's got it now. Same with that 5-star juco d-end. Eugene Smith has to feel that he could come in and compete much sooner than before. (but I'm sure WVU looks a hell of a lot better to him now)

USF at least has proved it can get the spotlight kids want (but they always seem to let it go), has access to a BCS bid, is in Florida and now needs some talent. Hopefully those on board stay on board and the rest of the slots are filled with some gamers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  1,894
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  10/14/2007

shoot look at the players were losing...........IF I WAS A RECRUIT...i wouldwant to come here.

Now with that being said,...we need some new coach's at key spots def. o.c, to sway some of these high school kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  19,525
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  24
  • Joined:  09/01/2006

I think smazza's punctutation will hurt more.  What parent would send their kid to USF if they see that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  1,894
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  10/14/2007

THE PLAYERS WERE LOSING ON THE FIELD not commits

why would I need to specify it seems pretty logical since we are losing alot of players on the field

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  4,501
  • Reputation:   93
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/25/2001

THE PLAYERS WERE LOSING ON THE FIELD not commits

why would I need to specify it seems pretty logical since we are losing alot of players on the field

I would have asked the same question.  Logical to you doesn't always mean its clear to everyone else.  Trust me I live with that all the time -  clear to me but ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  8,044
  • Reputation:   228
  • Days Won:  9
  • Joined:  12/23/2005

THE PLAYERS WERE LOSING ON THE FIELD not commits

why would I need to specify it seems pretty logical since we are losing alot of players on the field

In context to the topic of the thread your meaning was unclear.  I too would have assumed you meant losing recruits.

As for helping/hurting recruiting hopefully Leavitt can spin it too recruits, but I can't imagine it's a goldmine situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  1,894
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  10/14/2007

shoot look at the players were losing...........IF I WAS A RECRUIT...i wouldwant to come here.

Now with that being said,...we need some new coach's at key spots def. o.c, to sway some of these high school kids.

If i say, look the players who losing, and follow it with "IF I WAS A RECRUIT.." I would want to come here, how do you take it as were losing recruits, lol...

Were losing players=recruits should want to come..

its simple and pretty clear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.