Bull94 Posted October 30, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 8,722 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 23 Joined: 02/02/2005 Share Posted October 30, 2008 mo is a running back...and I was referring to mo being more dynamic runner then ben Williams. I find it hard to believe anyone would disagree with that. Mo is faster and has better vision. Marcus Edwards..has been a sure handed wr this year but he shouldnt get the quick passes. Mitchell showed he will play more and get the quick passes along with bogan if he is healthy. If we use our personell correctly we will win, if not and we come out simple simon with 5 wide, or ben williams..we will struggle.personally I think B Williams is the RB best suited for this offense. Good blocker (able to pick up blitzes when he is actually in the backfield) and very good receiver( able to release and run routes when not in blocking). I don't like him running between the tackles though. I actually don't like anyone running between the tackles as our speed and a spread offense should be used to the outside. Why run inside the majority of the time whne there are 5 300pound blockers and 4 275d-linemen to get through? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeG Posted October 30, 2008 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,737 Reputation: 3,854 Days Won: 175 Joined: 07/17/2003 Share Posted October 30, 2008 mo is a running back...and I was referring to mo being more dynamic runner then ben Williams. I find it hard to believe anyone would disagree with that. Mo is faster and has better vision. Marcus Edwards..has been a sure handed wr this year but he shouldnt get the quick passes. Mitchell showed he will play more and get the quick passes along with bogan if he is healthy. If we use our personell correctly we will win, if not and we come out simple simon with 5 wide, or ben williams..we will struggle.the way your paragraph reads, you start talking about passing and then about Mo-- how am I supposed to know you are talking about being a dynamic runner? Plus --- the stats still bear out that Ben is more "dynamic" (purely subjective term by the way) with a longer run from scrimmage and similar yards per carry averages. Add in his additional passing game contribution and bam-- to me that is more impactful on this offense. They have different running styles-- Taylor's is more fluid while Williams is sneaky quick/bowling ball like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullsOnThaRize8 Posted October 31, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 1,894 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/14/2007 Share Posted October 31, 2008 The... meant im throwing out different stuff jumbling it together. We all know mo isnt a weapon used with passing like Ben. I said when Ford and taylor went down so it should have been obvious i meant running. He is a more explosive threat, thats what i meant by dynamic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted October 31, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted October 31, 2008 Dear CJL: Mix up the offense, throw the ball on first down for a change, mix up the defensive schemes, mix up personnel, have the team wear their jerseys inside out. I don't care what you do, but you need to change something. Stop being so d@mn predictable that anyone who watches 5 minutes of game film can figure us out. I would rather go down swinging @ Cincy than watch another Pitt/Ville game plan. leavitt is incapable of such thingssame stuffsame resullt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted October 31, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted October 31, 2008 we are the bullsunprepparedstupid penaltiesdropped ballsstupid play callingpoor tacklingpoor clock management Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted October 31, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted October 31, 2008 mo is a running back...and I was referring to mo being more dynamic runner then ben Williams. I find it hard to believe anyone would disagree with that. Mo is faster and has better vision. Marcus Edwards..has been a sure handed wr this year but he shouldnt get the quick passes. Mitchell showed he will play more and get the quick passes along with bogan if he is healthy. If we use our personell correctly we will win, if not and we come out simple simon with 5 wide, or ben williams..we will struggle.the way your paragraph reads, you start talking about passing and then about Mo-- how am I supposed to know you are talking about being a dynamic runner? Plus --- the stats still bear out that Ben is more "dynamic" (purely subjective term by the way) with a longer run from scrimmage and similar yards per carry averages. Add in his additional passing game contribution and bam-- to me that is more impactful on this offense. They have different running styles-- Taylor's is more fluid while Williams is sneaky quick/bowling ball like. our offense doesnt allow for one rb to run the ballthe qb is the rbamaour gimmick offense is silly and amatuerish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted October 31, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted October 31, 2008 I'm tired of having the #1 offense in the Big East! MIX IT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!yeah1-2 in big big east going into tonights game#1 offenseyou dont know what an offense looks like kid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted October 31, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted October 31, 2008 are these people even watching the games?is leavitt and coaching staff watching1-3 in conference play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.