Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Rivals Recruiting Ranks UCF ahead of USF?


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  39
  • Content Count:  3,403
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/27/2005

Back to the 84 points.  Too many points (given we have 204 as of now) to be anything other than a 5 star player or numerous other players.  There was a comment that after Ford committed that we did not receive any points.  I wonder if someone accidently deleted Ford's points instead of adding them in.  Just a theory.

Something is definitely wrong with the current rating.  I mean it has Indiana with one 4-star and two 3-star recruits out of 19 and they are rated above us.  Hopefully Dave Glaser from USF.Rivals and get with them and straighten it out.

must be our punishment for not believing in the system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  724
  • Content Count:  10,219
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/17/2002

I don't mean to sound like Smazza, but how is a non-BCS school two years removed from going 0-17 having the same recruiting year as us? Is it because their new facilities? Is it because they have a coach that was hired by Notre Dame? What is it? We are doing great but I didn't expect for UCF to do as good as us.

it does not matter...or would you trade places with them?

what does a recruiting ranking matter before signing day when you have ford/mackenzie/grothe/outstanding young dline/stud wr's/sellar secondary/solid LB corp/a

very talented group of RS freshmen. (ALL young and already on campus)

pre-season top 25 ranking, dark horse status to do something really special in 2007.

would you really change places with them?

would you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  36
  • Content Count:  99
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/01/2005

I just compared our verbals on Scout to UCF. Its kinda of funny (nit sure how true the "offers" are but most of their 3 stars have other offers not from any strong programs, but our two stars much less three stars, have offers from power houses (even from the great Ron Zook who can't coach, but can recruit)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  39
  • Content Count:  3,403
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/27/2005

I just compared our verbals on Scout to UCF. Its kinda of funny (nit sure how true the "offers" are but most of their 3 stars have other offers not from any strong programs, but our two stars much less three stars, have offers from power houses (even from the great Ron Zook who can't coach, but can recruit)

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,088
  • Content Count:  8,158
  • Reputation:   107
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  02/11/2004

I've heard from reliable sources that Claude Davis will have a difficult time qualifying.  Just throwing it out there.  We'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  39
  • Content Count:  254
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/02/2006

Rivals fixed their error on our ranking.  We are now back ahead of UCF(only one spot ahead but ahead).  We are 57 not 66 like we were yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  104
  • Content Count:  1,981
  • Reputation:   1
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/02/2002

Rivals fixed their error on our ranking.  We are now back ahead of UCF(only one spot ahead but ahead).  We are 57 not 66 like we were yesterday.

Was it an error or did we move up now that Claude Davis and Butler are 3***?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  300
  • Content Count:  7,993
  • Reputation:   968
  • Days Won:  21
  • Joined:  10/31/2005

If 2 3-star players were worth 100 points (which we moved up from yesterday to today) then we should have a lot more than 300.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  9,898
  • Content Count:  66,091
  • Reputation:   2,434
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  01/01/2001

I don't mean to sound like Smazza, but how is a non-BCS school two years removed from going 0-17 having the same recruiting year as us? Is it because their new facilities? Is it because they have a coach that was hired by Notre Dame? What is it? We are doing great but I didn't expect for UCF to do as good as us.

disgraceful

with 2 coaches leaving usf,the bulls will get screwed

usf has done underachieved in recruiting from day one and the trend continues

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  9,898
  • Content Count:  66,091
  • Reputation:   2,434
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  01/01/2001

Back to the 84 points.  Too many points (given we have 204 as of now) to be anything other than a 5 star player or numerous other players.  There was a comment that after Ford committed that we did not receive any points.  I wonder if someone accidently deleted Ford's points instead of adding them in.  Just a theory.

Something is definitely wrong with the current rating.  I mean it has Indiana with one 4-star and two 3-star recruits out of 19 and they are rated above us.  Hopefully Dave Glaser from USF.Rivals and get with them and straighten it out.

something is wrong!   usf cant mine the tremendous talent in the state

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.