windbane Posted January 24, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 39 Content Count: 3,403 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/27/2005 Share Posted January 24, 2007 Back to the 84 points. Too many points (given we have 204 as of now) to be anything other than a 5 star player or numerous other players. There was a comment that after Ford committed that we did not receive any points. I wonder if someone accidently deleted Ford's points instead of adding them in. Just a theory.Something is definitely wrong with the current rating. I mean it has Indiana with one 4-star and two 3-star recruits out of 19 and they are rated above us. Hopefully Dave Glaser from USF.Rivals and get with them and straighten it out. must be our punishment for not believing in the system Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulls96go Posted January 25, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 724 Content Count: 10,219 Reputation: 2 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/17/2002 Share Posted January 25, 2007 I don't mean to sound like Smazza, but how is a non-BCS school two years removed from going 0-17 having the same recruiting year as us? Is it because their new facilities? Is it because they have a coach that was hired by Notre Dame? What is it? We are doing great but I didn't expect for UCF to do as good as us.it does not matter...or would you trade places with them?what does a recruiting ranking matter before signing day when you have ford/mackenzie/grothe/outstanding young dline/stud wr's/sellar secondary/solid LB corp/avery talented group of RS freshmen. (ALL young and already on campus)pre-season top 25 ranking, dark horse status to do something really special in 2007.would you really change places with them?would you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullchip Posted January 25, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 36 Content Count: 99 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/01/2005 Share Posted January 25, 2007 I just compared our verbals on Scout to UCF. Its kinda of funny (nit sure how true the "offers" are but most of their 3 stars have other offers not from any strong programs, but our two stars much less three stars, have offers from power houses (even from the great Ron Zook who can't coach, but can recruit) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
windbane Posted January 25, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 39 Content Count: 3,403 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/27/2005 Share Posted January 25, 2007 I just compared our verbals on Scout to UCF. Its kinda of funny (nit sure how true the "offers" are but most of their 3 stars have other offers not from any strong programs, but our two stars much less three stars, have offers from power houses (even from the great Ron Zook who can't coach, but can recruit) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
___ Eats It Posted January 25, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,088 Content Count: 8,158 Reputation: 107 Days Won: 3 Joined: 02/11/2004 Share Posted January 25, 2007 I've heard from reliable sources that Claude Davis will have a difficult time qualifying. Just throwing it out there. We'll see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowlBoundBulls Posted January 25, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 39 Content Count: 254 Reputation: 2 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/02/2006 Share Posted January 25, 2007 Rivals fixed their error on our ranking. We are now back ahead of UCF(only one spot ahead but ahead). We are 57 not 66 like we were yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Toro Posted January 25, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 104 Content Count: 1,981 Reputation: 1 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/02/2002 Share Posted January 25, 2007 Rivals fixed their error on our ranking. We are now back ahead of UCF(only one spot ahead but ahead). We are 57 not 66 like we were yesterday.Was it an error or did we move up now that Claude Davis and Butler are 3***? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SANJAY Posted January 25, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 300 Content Count: 7,993 Reputation: 968 Days Won: 21 Joined: 10/31/2005 Share Posted January 25, 2007 If 2 3-star players were worth 100 points (which we moved up from yesterday to today) then we should have a lot more than 300. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted January 26, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,898 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted January 26, 2007 I don't mean to sound like Smazza, but how is a non-BCS school two years removed from going 0-17 having the same recruiting year as us? Is it because their new facilities? Is it because they have a coach that was hired by Notre Dame? What is it? We are doing great but I didn't expect for UCF to do as good as us.disgracefulwith 2 coaches leaving usf,the bulls will get screwedusf has done underachieved in recruiting from day one and the trend continues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted January 26, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,898 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted January 26, 2007 Back to the 84 points.  Too many points (given we have 204 as of now) to be anything other than a 5 star player or numerous other players.  There was a comment that after Ford committed that we did not receive any points.  I wonder if someone accidently deleted Ford's points instead of adding them in.  Just a theory.Something is definitely wrong with the current rating.  I mean it has Indiana with one 4-star and two 3-star recruits out of 19 and they are rated above us.  Hopefully Dave Glaser from USF.Rivals and get with them and straighten it out.something is wrong! usf cant mine the tremendous talent in the state Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now