USF to continue starting quarterback search after spring ball - The Oracle

[olafberserker]

3 hours ago, GoBulls84 said:

Ummmmmm, if he had 21 straight completions (if that was the number, I know it was close to that), then the rest of his stat line would've been 15 for 29, which is a little over 50 percent (not great, but considerably better than the 35 percent rate you just through out).

Consider his stat line for his first two in-game appearances were 0-2 and 2-3. So the two games he was the starter he was 34-45. I know you're just trying to give Outlaw s---, but the math was wrong and you can toss his first two appearances IMO

lol, mathing ain't easy. 

I'm not giving anyone **** as a matter of fact he decided to drag out a 6 month old discussion that he was/is dead wrong on, but trying to say that BB clearly outplayed GB based on the "stats" is dumb.  and even worse is saying that GB isn't a D1 caliber QB.   Either guy has shown to be capable of leading this team thus far.  I'll defer to CAG on who should start

[Outlaw]

11 minutes ago, olafberserker said:

1 guy (player 1) faced BYU, Howard, UF, Louisville, ECU, Cincinnati, and Tulane

1 guy (player 2) faced Temple, SMU, Tulsa, and ucf

most of those stats for player 2 was against Tulsa ... the 99th defense in the country last season

Trying to argue that player 2 is better than player 1 based on the "stats" is just stupid ... but

UCF peformed better than every team you listed but Tulane.

3 minutes ago, olafberserker said:

lol, mathing ain't easy. 

I'm not giving anyone **** as a matter of fact he decided to drag out a 6 month old discussion that he was/is dead wrong on, but trying to say that BB clearly outplayed GB based on the "stats" is dumb.  and even worse is saying that GB isn't a D1 caliber QB.   Either guy has shown to be capable of leading this team thus far.  I'll defer to CAG on who should start

Actually I said his stats aren't good good for a d1 qb. He ranked 95th.

Edited April 7, 2023 by Outlaw

[Outlaw]

9 minutes ago, olafberserker said:

I think the argument that ccs is our 2nd best coach speaks volumes for the analytic ability of anyone trying to make it .... just saying

Well he is the only coach that is over 0.500 here at Usf other then Leavitt.

[olafberserker]

Just now, Outlaw said:

UCF is just as good last year or better than every team you listed but Tulane.

LOL ....FALSE

[olafberserker]

37 minutes ago, Friscobull said:

BB has that moxy thing but if you ignore GB’s athletic talent you are fooling yourself.  GB was showing  how he could carry the team on his back, pick up the necessary 3rd down yards every time.  BB came in while the offense already started clicking so that was an advantage.  I like them both so I won’t be disappointed either way, however our defense is complete trash, if they don’t drastically improve we could have Joe Montana under center and we would still be sub 500.

That is BS, willie rebuilt, cCS tore down, end of story.

 

11 minutes ago, olafberserker said:

I think the argument that ccs is our 2nd best coach speaks volumes for the analytic ability of anyone trying to make it .... just saying

 

1 minute ago, Outlaw said:

Well he is the only coach that is over 0.500 here at Usf other then Leavitt.

I rest my case

[USFBULL_08]

Isreal Carter coming in could also be a factor. The QB position is in a great place.

[Outlaw]

4 minutes ago, olafberserker said:

LOL ....FALSE

So what other team played for a conference championship on that list ?

[Outlaw]

7 minutes ago, olafberserker said:

LOL ....FALSE

So what team other than Tulane had a better record than UCF  and eent to their conference champions last year? 

[olafberserker]

9 minutes ago, Outlaw said:

So what team other than Tulane had a better record than UCF  and eent to their conference champions last year? 

You're just being foolish now ...... 

[Outlaw]

7 minutes ago, olafberserker said:

You're just being foolish now ...... 

So none.