ssgCraigO

Finally have them. Like for reals this time http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools.../2015-16/release/release_20151028aaa_sfla.pdf

USF 27-21 Mack Adams 402

That's what I was thinking also. Playing the "IF" game, if CWT stays and the offense remains pretty much the same as it is, it kind of works in Q's favor right?

I thought it was like Metric vs Standard

I hate the "they wouldn't go undefeated in this conference." argument. It's such a BS statement that you used to use with the Big East. Some P5 schools would not go undefeated in this conference either. When Alabama plays Vandy or Kentucky nobody believes they will lose, and they count it as a sure win. Yet somehow Vandy and Kentucky get a pass just because they play in the SEC. Do they assume that in a different conference Vandy and KY would automatically dominate? I just hate when they throw out the W-L record and say it was a fluke. Like when the Big East had the second best BCS record but somehow couldn't hang with everybody else. I guess I just grew up with the only numbers that matter is the W-L. No this not a rant on how the AAC is the best conference ever, it's a rant on being tired of all the media bias. (looking at you SEC) rant over

Never mind thought I found it. It was the SMU one. I hang my head in shame.

Never mind found it.

Good read. Were can you find the one for USF?

bump

Rich Cirminiello @RichCirminiello If #USF stays hot, wonder if #Canes would consider Willie Taggart ..rough stint in Tampa, but still think he has high ceiling as HC just going to leave this here

He got asked about the WKU game in in the press conference. He stated something like "Well, we lost big, so I will not be using that game plan"

UConn went with 9-10 guys in the box and got beat long. That's the whole premise of the offense. Lure them in with runs and screens then hit some over the top. That's what they did to Cuse also. Seems like SMU was more worried about getting beat over the top then Q running and they paid for it. As for running the same plays over and over? I am all for it. Makes me think of the Sun Bowl when Oregon ran the same play all day and thrashed us with it. If it is working why change it? In fact, I felt they should of ran it more today instead of try to get cute with pass plays. I get it though. I agree, I don't think CWT is the long term solution. However, for right NOW the players are getting better and there is finally some signs of life on the offense. These are good things.

They should of stuck with the oversized gold horns on the helmet too.

Also, can Byrd finally make Defense Player of the Week? I don't know what else he has to do.

I cant make any games this year. I don't want to be part of the problem.

I know a lot of people have already pinned AW the starter next year. Q has taken control of this offense and is playing better every week. Don't want to play the "IF" game, but think what his numbers would of been this week if someone would/could catch a ball.

Memphis just hung 66 and we held them to 24. This team is set up with athletes to stop those kind of offenses. Makes CWT look even better after recruiting all the DB's that he has during his time here.

What happened to DJ? Saw this Joey Knight @TBTimes_Bulls Taggart doesn't have full report on D'Ernest, but D'Ernest told him he felt like he'd be OK

He carried this team today no doubt about that.

I think that is the main thing. They have made this offense around his skill set, and it is working.

GRRRREEEEEENNNNN!!!!!!!!!

Someone brought up in a different thread that our losses have come by teams with a combined record of 14-4. All of those losses are from Maryland.

I was wondering the same thing JCHEM. Who is the 4th RB?