Disclaimer: I'm no football guru. Though, I was pretty good at Tecmo Bowl.
(read the bold for the executive summary version!)
Leavitt installed an offense based on the QB doing most of the work, with fast receivers running everywhere. We could never run the ball well out of the back position because it's tough as heck to get a top RB (okay, we got Hall but he was a JUCO), not to mention good offensive linemen. And I always thought it was the latter: poor run blocking.
And then we got great athletes on the defensive side. He pumped them up before games and they went out and caused havoc -most of the time.
Case in point, I don't think we've had many players drafted on the offensive side of the ball.
Coaches who recognized Leavitt's trick always managed to beat him, like that guy who coaches for the Bucs now.
Holtz stepped in and inherited a pretty good system, at least in year one. And then I don't know what happened. Well, yeah, the defense went south... Okay, but that's a dead horse.
In comes our current coach, who wants to install a completely different kind of football system.
Brad had brought it up in another thread, about all the positions other than the QB. And I think that's a good point.
Is it a matter of switching everything offensively and then just pulling the switch or does it take a few years?
(1) Do we have the line people to block for a 1,000-yard runner?
(2) Do we have that kind of workhorse runner?
(3) Do we have the QB and receiver(s)/TE combo to get us that first down each time?
Right now, it worries me a lot, the offense that is. Coach came in as the signing period ended. He had no time to bring in the guys that are needed for his kind of offense. I don't see how the staff will make all the offensive changes necessary for next year and be successful --when we don't have all the right players.
I'm hanging my hat on the defense. I hope they are a great bunch, the best we've seen in years. We're going to need them to step up.