Breedwell

JUST A TOUCH OVER THROWN

After that TD UCF has gone 6 plays -14 yards

CYA LATER

I don't want that **** saw and I'm not interested in a Citizen.

That's a lot better. Can we NOT have commercials every five seconds?

Okay I had to really zoom in to figure out what the heck the top right graphic was. Its a pretty cool map honestly, but considering no one but the turf will be seeing the crown of those helmets, its a little too much. Not to mention the white line as the 'guide' looks like flagella.

With it being our last game of the year, its gotta be throwback green jerseys.

I know some of our guys saw last weeks poll. VJ mentioned SDSU being ahead of us last week. Hopefully they see this disrespect and use it as extra motivation to pummel the knights.

You know what though? One thing I don't believe I've seen mentioned in all of our gripe about the defense is how well and how quickly the offense performs. We boast and are proud about the offense scoring on one play, or scoring in under two minutes. What kind of effect does that have on the defense? I wouldn't be surprised if the defense is gassed after the first quarter, even with good conditioning. There were definitive times last night where the defense looked better. I wager that's due to the additional rotations they were putting out. When the offense is only on the field for a few plays for a couple minutes, none of those guys have a chance to sit down for a minute and catch their breath and look at some adjustments. They're sitting for a few minutes and already its time to go dance again.

"Well if we never ruined out relationship with the Jim, maybe he'd come back and be our defensive coordinator" "Nah, Judy ruined athletics blah blah blah blah" Covered those two topics now as well

I think he's more elusive than BJ, but I think BJ would have been as good as him. Taggart embraces Flowers' running abilities. Skip wanted BJ in the pocket as a safeguard for depth reasons. I think the offense as a whole is more talented now, so less pressure would be put on BJ to go all out like he did.

It says we only dropped 1. For what it's worth Navy, USC and Stanford jumped us, and it appears only Arkansas, and Houston went below. Would be a net loss of 1 there.

42-24 is not too different than 46-30. Against USA, yeah, but still.

That's because they're ranked 25 lol

White gets the last laugh? Pitt gets pity votes for beating the #2 team, I get that. and SDSU is one loss. But man, I'd take us over Troy and SDSU right now.

That's disrespek.

We can go back and forth about all the championships we've won, instead look at the ones who actually won some. Bama wins on their defense. Without the incredible defense they're working with now that offense assuredly isn't carrying them very far. Its good but certainly not that good. Ours is better. Defense wins championships. But, if your offense is hot garbage, you look like UCF. And F those guys.

Did anyone happen to catch this clip and record it? I'd love to see what was actually said. And on that note, I saw that the Flowers > Adams catch on that final drive was "nominated" for the SC top 10. Did it make the cut?

If you have access to the internet, no reason one can't watch the game live..

D'Ernest Johnson can tie a steel beam in a knot... with his tongue.

considering how good we are at sailing, I wonder if that translates.

Mainly because the cupboard was bare and he only ever picked up one QB at a time. -- My only thoughts is I wonder how players like Giddens would have played under the tutelage of a Leavitt staff.

the general casual or 'its on while I'm at the bar with friends' kind of observer might think this, but those such as ourselves who are more passionate may know better. But nonetheless, we also know that Notre Dame typically pulls in better recruiting classes in terms of football ability, and normally or "traditionally" is a better team. So, though we know that Notre Dame isn't a great team this year, we also know they are supposed to have a good foundation for football players. The conclusion I would make is that, even though Notre Dame is on a down year, this is a good win for the program and of course the conference.

I think we would beat them. While they're certainly heating up, the biggest problem during that game was the 11 penalties for a whopping 88 yards. Most of them were on offense but one of the defensive penalties was that stupid and untimely unsportsmanlike penalty on Juwuan Brown after that sack. Would have put them at 2nd and 27 and arguably would have led to a punt by Temple. Instead, that gave them a first down and led to a touchdown. The holding penalty that negated and effectively made QF's run that led to his injury was costly, as it eventually forced us to play Kean on a 3rd and forever out of his own endzone. I don't blame him for throwing the INT he did, that was a lot of pressure on the young man. Not much different than when Eveld came in on 3rd and (17?) against FSU in 2012 and got sack-fumbled for an eventual TD that changed the game. I think the team, while allowing so many points and yards over time against Navy, showed a lot more discipline while the game was more competitive. 42-14 is a great place to be in at halftime against any opponent, especially a ranked one. So I think that if the team was given an opportunity to right the ship, they would do so. And would at least put themselves up out of reach before slowing their jets and letting Temple get a couple TDs back.

The Magic, the Solar Bears, hell, the MLS team. Stetson?