Usually, your rival team in HS is in the same confererence or cassification as you are, and you're competing for standings in conference. Let's say you went to a 5-A school in FLA, you're not going to have any real "rivalry" with the 4-A  (or 3-A or 6-A, whatver, you get the point) school down the road from you, no matter how close they might be, and how many players know each other, because you're not in the same division. Your confusing important game with rivalry.  If we used your definintion here then UF FSU isnt a rivalry.  A rivalry is a game that standings conference titles etc all go out the window, a rivalry is personal and goes deeper then standings rankings etc.  A rivalry is a game that can make your season even if its the only game you win.  I think you'd be hard-pressed to find anyone who would consider FSU-UF a true rivalry before 1978, say, even though they've played each other since the 50's.  It wasn't until both teams began competing at the same level year-in and year-out that it became a rivalry of any importance, especially to FSU fans.  Up until that point, FSU was an afterthought, they were bottom feeders that UF didn't really care about, and FSU fans were envious of the success of their conterparts in G'ville, but the game wasn't huge to them either. So again, it's all about level of play. This is what I was getting at with the conference/division talk in my previous post. Up until '75-'76, I'd say UF-FSU was like a 6-A school playing a neigboring 3-A school and kicking their asses every year. Then over the course of the next several years, that 3-A school upped its enrollment and starting getting better players and coaches, and all of a sudden became a 6-A school on the same level as their opponent. At this point, UCF is still a step behind USF. Not as drastic as the UF-FSU analogy above, but similar. USF is in the big-leagues already--they've got BCS affiliation, and all they lack is some consistent play at bowl-worthy level. UCF still is trying to get to that level.  A rivalry with a *slightly* bigger in-state brother is key to them, while it's not just that big of a deal to USF.  why dont you go ask the players if its important or not.......And ok i used a bad example, ok how about USC Vs ND, UF Vs UGA.  Nitpicking my analogy doesnt prove anything, like i said it starts with the players and if you've read anything all from our players about this game they are amped and ready and treating it like a rivalry.  Dude, it doesn't matter what example you want to use, the same rule applies. USC-ND was a rivaly because both teams were giants competing year in and year out for national supremacy.  UF and UGA were rivals because they were the big boys of the SEC, both competing for that conference championship on a yearly basis. Think about it--why didn't UF form a rivalry with GA Tech? They're just as close in proximity to UF as is UGA. It all boils down to competing on a similar level for a BIG common goal. And if competing for notoriety in the state of FLA is the only common thing between UCF and USF, that's a pretty flimsy bond. Who gives a crap about the rivalry between Tennessee and Memphis, for instance, other than the players on either team that might have gone to HS together? No one. The fans don't. The nation doesn't. There's more to a rivalry than that, IMO. Teams of similar ability level- Check Competeing for a similar goal- Check And if you think both schools are just competeing for notiriety in the state your dead wrong.  This game effects recruiting and both teams images nationally.  Both are seen as up coming schools in this state and the nation by most people that know college football.  If a school can dominate this game it will show it is the up in coming school in this state which will get it more national coverage and better recruits.  Doesnt seem flimsy to me at all.  If USF can go out there and win convincingly maybe they get some of those lil feel good up and coming program stories that ESPN and other outlets gave UCF a lil while back.  Both of these programs will be successful in the future, theres too much talent in this state for them not to (unless the administration gives up on one of them) the one that can get to a high level first will have a huge advantage and what better way to stay ahead then to play them and win.  Yes winning is not inevitable but if we are as good and so far ahead as alot of people think why not make them a whipping boy to show they arent on our level so we can get more national attention and an edge in the in state recruiting wars? ÂÂ