Tulane made their comeback against the starters, sure there were subs in and out but you know nobody plays the WHOLE game. I know you get easy brownie points without regard to logic here just for contradicting me, but there is nothing but truth in the statement that the other guy was throwing proverbial stones in a glass house; don't criticize others that had same problem/weakness as you! The only difference between the two games was one team was playing a good team and lost while the other team was playing a bad team and held on. I know you aren't that dense.
Wow, quite the use of semantics. However you need to twist it to hide your faulty statement is okay by me. Even if Houston pulled out the narrow victory against Memphis and just say both teams nearly lost their leads, if you really think being up by 10 against Memphis is safer than being up by more than 4 touchdowns against Tulane then I don't know what to say at this point.