Velcro Posted January 7, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 999 Content Count: 19,229 Reputation: 7 Days Won: 1 Joined: 01/14/2002 Share Posted January 7, 2005 If perrilloux were to come, we'd probably be better than that! Especially if he made his intent known earlier than signing day... it would open the floodgates ahh, to dream Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papa_Bull Posted January 7, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 375 Content Count: 3,144 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/23/2001 Author Share Posted January 7, 2005 Even getting Carlton Hill again at this time, would help with our recruiting. It would be a sign that he still believes highly in the future of the USF football program, despite our poor season, enough to turn down offers from many Top schools. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velcro Posted January 7, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 999 Content Count: 19,229 Reputation: 7 Days Won: 1 Joined: 01/14/2002 Share Posted January 7, 2005 I agree, and that might even help nudge on Ryan just a big (probably not enough). Who wouldn't want to throw passes to a bunch of speedy 6'3-6'5 receivers (green, hill, peyton) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullpride08 Posted January 7, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 38 Content Count: 4,016 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/20/2002 Share Posted January 7, 2005 If my rough and dirty predictions, and some of what I am hearing comes true we'll land 3-4 four star players based on rivals assessment.As it stands Hill's a go, Gordon wouldn't be shocking, or a few others. One or two that are committed elsewhere. If we land that many four stars, sprinkle in a majority of three star athletes, then by rivals estimates that would put us around 31-36 based on last year's rankings. We could do much better, or slightly worse. Land Perrilloux, with the certainty of others, and we jump into the top 30. Perrilloux is a five star on both boards- only 29 five stars available in rivals.My prediction is 32. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papa_Bull Posted January 7, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 375 Content Count: 3,144 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/23/2001 Author Share Posted January 7, 2005 Just for the record I checked the 31-35 box when I started this thread, but it seemed more likely that we would be 36-40. So, I'll go with #35. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papa_Bull Posted January 8, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 375 Content Count: 3,144 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/23/2001 Author Share Posted January 8, 2005 Rivals just reclassified Carlton Hill with 4 stars, so that will help our ranking if we land him.http://usf.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?pr_key=26913 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdgukhsdgl Posted January 8, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 287 Content Count: 3,078 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/18/2002 Share Posted January 8, 2005 Rivals just reclassified Carlton Hill with 4 stars, so that will help our ranking if we land him.http://usf.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?pr_key=26913they must have thought he was a lock for UM.... he'll be a two star come signing day if he goes with us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papa_Bull Posted January 10, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 375 Content Count: 3,144 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/23/2001 Author Share Posted January 10, 2005 There are a few players who are seriously considering USF who have NOW been given three stars by Rivals: Gary Watts, Garrett White and Tyller Roberts. We have a good chance of landing all three of them, so our ranking may be somewhat better than predicted.Last year, Ole Miss was #30 in team ranking. They had 24 commits, 11 of which were 3 stars and 3 at 4 stars.It certainly is conceivable that we could have those type of numbers this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest S. Bien Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 My, my it seems the world of re-classification is taking hold at rivals again. Watts, and White getting three stars. Great athletes, with loads of potential but I'd hardly call them three stars now.Roberts deserves three stars. Again, the problem with rivals is right now bigger school web-guru's are pumping up the recruits for fans. A complete disservice to the fans, and players- unreal expectations.I think USF lands 3-4 four star athletes, and we could land as many as 15 3 star, especially considering guys like Watts, White, and Roberts already have been reclassified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knight_fan Posted January 10, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 60 Content Count: 289 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/21/2004 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Personally I think you've also got to watch the Orlando Sentinel Top 100 to get a feel for these things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now