Apis Bull Posted January 3, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 23,185 Reputation: 2,332 Days Won: 65 Joined: 09/05/2002 Author Share Posted January 3, 2008 Bump for those interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted January 3, 2008 Group: Admin Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 97,018 Reputation: 10,817 Days Won: 469 Joined: 05/19/2000 Share Posted January 3, 2008 This really isn't a fair graph... I'm a big Seth homer... but if you want the graph to be statistically correct, you should compare each of the coaches first season's. Seth in this graph has an advantage as he had a chance to have his most talented hand picked team in 02 (that was Seth's six season). Same could be said somewhat for RMC (his third season). Stan is still dealing with RMC players for the most part. Just my two cents.Sheriff,I'm no Seth homer but I will say that Seth in his first year had far, far less to work with than Heath (or McCullum)...that would hardly be a fair comparison, but if you want to look at first years I think Stan has the edge in the inherited talent department. I think Paschal left Seth with very little. I see images of David Adler... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.