feast your eyes on the greatest

[KnightsRule]

you know nothing about your bruins

you were off  about 5 years on your players from the 60's.I don't have time to show you how often you are wrong

now you have a selective memory?

bonds would hit 100 homers in fenway.

ted williams has no head. why are you talking about heads.

a ted williams syncophant is talking about someone  else's head.  you are too much you ftu idiot!

lets keep talking about heads. frozen heads,decapitated heads.   . ....

Smazz, as usual you talk smack and cant back up nothing with fact. Show me where I was wrong on any Bruins players. You wont do it cuz you cant do it.  I know more about the bruins then most people so please show me, take time out of your busy day and do a little research.  You must have early signs of alzheimers.

[smazza]

kr- you go look at your own posts telling me I didn't see phil esposito play hockey in the 60's you idiot.

you said he didn't play in the 60's you idiot big mouth

is it clear too you now?

is it in focus yet?

[smazza]

[smazza]

the greatest point guard ever

Earvin "Magic" Johnson

Few athletes are truly unique, changing the way their sport is played with their singular skills. Earvin "Magic" Johnson was one of them. Just how great a basketball player was Johnson? So great, perhaps, that future generations of hoop fans may wish they had entered the world years earlier-just so they could have seen Magic play in person instead of watching him only on highlight reels. He was what Bob Cousy was to the 1950s, what Oscar Robertson was to the 1960s, what Julius Erving was to the 1970s. Still, Earvin Johnson was even more than a revolutionary player who, at 6-9, was the tallest point guard in league history

[bulls96go]

bonds is ok in my book

did he take the roids?

[smazza]

innocent until proven guilty

[Velcro]

public opinion doesn't go by the same rules as a courtroom...

OJ is guilty as can be, but not guilty in court... public opinion doesn't have rules.

[smazza]

oj is guilty? where was the weapon? any eye witness?

public opinion? where?

slavery used to be legal so I am not impressed with public opinion.it counts very little.what a jury finds is of more consequence.

[Velcro]

there's plenty of proof for public opinion to think he's guilty... but he got away with it and was deemed not-guilty... NOT Innocent.

what a jury finds is important... but it isn't the end all...

what about the inadmisable letter from OJ... if that made it through, he would have been guilty, but it was blocked, and he walks... a free murderer.

[Velcro]

The big question! Do you think OJ is guilty?

[ 2539]  70.8% - Yes

[  680]  19.0% - No

[  355]   9.9% - No Answer

http://www.survey.net/oj2r.html