Dmince Posted January 10, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 71 Content Count: 401 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/22/2002 Share Posted January 10, 2007 no way Bobby Bowden is kept out of the preseason top 25. College football is way too political Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubuffsdoug Posted January 10, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 209 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/26/2006 Share Posted January 10, 2007 Great for USF but how is Rutgers not mentioned in the top 25???  They are losing more than half of their starters... basically, it could be a rebuilding year for them.some of you are like a broken record.  money see money do:  RU has 7 starters back on offense and 7 starters back on defense, so how can that be a rebuilding year?I'm not sure of your sources, but according to the depth chart on Rivals, Rutgers is losing 13 of thier 22 starters including four of their five OL.  That's only 7 returning total, not on each side of the ball.  That would qualify as a rebuilding year.  Money.I've explain this a million time on this site about how RU list the players. Rival doesn't have correct info. Here we go again: RU returns 16 of the 2 deep on offense. 6 of their 8 top linemen return with experience. They do lose Leonard FB-starter, Harris TE-starter, S. Johnson TE-3rd backup, Foster WR-5th backup, along with 2 OL-starters. Defensively they'll be without 8 players in the 2 deep. They lose Meekins DT-starter, Beckford DE-co starter, Giacobbe DT-backup, Thompson-LB-starter, Frierson-LB-starter, Roberson-CB-starter, Porter-CB-backup and Collins-CB-backup. RU will have 7 returns starters on offense (16 total) and 7 starters returning on defense (14 total) with G. Johnson who co-started with Beckford. I understand how some people have to say a lie enough to make him or herself believe it. I think this is the case here with a lot of USF fans. You know about as much info on RU as I do about USF. I had a USF fan email (scout board) me info about USF that I had no idea about it. It contain a lot of info that put USF in a different light with some incoming players that address some pressing needs. I haven't gone into depth about RU, but I am giving better info than rival about the depth and returning players for RU. It seems like some of you don't want to hear it because you want to believe in what you're thinking already.go to www.scarletknights.com (RU's official site) to cross check the player's status (eligibility) against rivals and see who's right. The football roster will show you class listing and eligibility listing as well as position, height, weight, high school and hometown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lanshire12 Posted January 10, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 3 Content Count: 76 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/28/2006 Share Posted January 10, 2007 Great for USF but how is Rutgers not mentioned in the top 25???  They are losing more than half of their starters... basically, it could be a rebuilding year for them.Their offense consisted of handing the ball to Rice and jumping on for the ride...how has that changed??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lanshire12 Posted January 10, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 3 Content Count: 76 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/28/2006 Share Posted January 10, 2007 It ain't how you start it is how you finish.  We will be considered a top 30 team next year going into the season.  We will have plenty of opportunity to show on the field what we can do.  The polls are an odd emotional driven entity seldom driven by factual analysis.Not complete true!!If you don't start somewhere near the top in the beginning, you're journey up is twice as hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grateful Dad Posted January 10, 2007 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 110 Content Count: 5,410 Reputation: 1,335 Days Won: 10 Joined: 09/18/2005 Share Posted January 10, 2007 I've explain this a million time on this site about how RU list the players. You have 21 posts. Did you post the other times under another name? :-? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted January 10, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,898 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted January 10, 2007 it will be fun to see usf in the top 25 ranking role Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiohead Posted January 11, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 3 Content Count: 135 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/25/2004 Share Posted January 11, 2007 Great for USF but how is Rutgers not mentioned in the top 25???  They are losing more than half of their starters... basically, it could be a rebuilding year for them.Their offense consisted of handing the ball to Rice and jumping on for the ride...how has that changed???Brian Leonard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigGameBulls Posted January 11, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 20 Content Count: 193 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/10/2005 Share Posted January 11, 2007 Your a nasty man Radioheed.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiohead Posted January 11, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 3 Content Count: 135 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/25/2004 Share Posted January 11, 2007 hahahahhanasty is averaging a turnover per minute...oops wrong thread and wrong sport Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
windbane Posted January 11, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 39 Content Count: 3,403 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/27/2005 Share Posted January 11, 2007 Great for USF but how is Rutgers not mentioned in the top 25??? They are losing more than half of their starters... basically, it could be a rebuilding year for them.some of you are like a broken record. money see money do: RU has 7 starters back on offense and 7 starters back on defense, so how can that be a rebuilding year?I'm not sure of your sources, but according to the depth chart on Rivals, Rutgers is losing 13 of thier 22 starters including four of their five OL. That's only 7 returning total, not on each side of the ball. That would qualify as a rebuilding year. Money.I've explain this a million time on this site about how RU list the players. Rival doesn't have correct info. Here we go again: RU returns 16 of the 2 deep on offense. 6 of their 8 top linemen return with experience. They do lose Leonard FB-starter, Harris TE-starter, S. Johnson TE-3rd backup, Foster WR-5th backup, along with 2 OL-starters. Defensively they'll be without 8 players in the 2 deep. They lose Meekins DT-starter, Beckford DE-co starter, Giacobbe DT-backup, Thompson-LB-starter, Frierson-LB-starter, Roberson-CB-starter, Porter-CB-backup and Collins-CB-backup. RU will have 7 returns starters on offense (16 total) and 7 starters returning on defense (14 total) with G. Johnson who co-started with Beckford. I understand how some people have to say a lie enough to make him or herself believe it. I think this is the case here with a lot of USF fans. You know about as much info on RU as I do about USF. I had a USF fan email (scout board) me info about USF that I had no idea about it. It contain a lot of info that put USF in a different light with some incoming players that address some pressing needs. I haven't gone into depth about RU, but I am giving better info than rival about the depth and returning players for RU. It seems like some of you don't want to hear it because you want to believe in what you're thinking already.go to www.scarletknights.com (RU's official site) to cross check the player's status (eligibility) against rivals and see who's right. The football roster will show you class listing and eligibility listing as well as position, height, weight, high school and hometown. thank you. I remember a thread about this before. I think Rutgers has a chance to be ranked pre-season with Schiano staying and adding validity to the program's future. Whatever the pre-season, I think the big east has a good chance to have at least 4 teams ranked next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now