Guest BasketBull. Posted October 17, 2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 I'm not knowledgeable enough to know the defensive schemes, but it seems like we are different from the past.What's different (scheme-wise)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted October 17, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 I bulleive that the thin and inexperienced line hasn't been as effective stopping the run, thus we have blitzed less often than in the past. Hopefully that changes with Julmiste and Clerbert returning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E.T. Posted October 17, 2006 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 4,748 Content Count: 37,650 Reputation: 2,359 Days Won: 29 Joined: 12/24/2001 Share Posted October 17, 2006 I can't really comment enough on schemes as I have really only "watched" one replay.But am sure having Clebert back has really helped Run Defense.Agree that the lack of blitzing has been the thin D-line. Having Julmiste back has really got to help.Have been impressed with Cray's play though ... really getting penetration and getting to the QB's.Still am really suprised with Chris Robinson. #49 really reminds me of old #41, Pierson. This kid is very athletic and makes things happen. A serious SPEED Rusher from the end.Selvie also seems to be a very solid and complete DE and he and Julmiste should be strong the rest of the season and the next 2! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beastiebull Posted October 17, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 135 Content Count: 3,809 Reputation: 82 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/26/2001 Share Posted October 17, 2006 D is different in that we don't blitz. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull Dozer Posted October 17, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 343 Content Count: 13,697 Reputation: 2,041 Days Won: 45 Joined: 09/04/2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 We're less agressive schemewise with less stunting and blitzing. Coverages look pretty much the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now