Jump to content

cmhatter

Member
  • Posts

    8,174
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by cmhatter

  1. i found this gem quoted by Odom on Twitter: @ByJeffOdom: Taggart on why receivers aren't getting the ball more: "We're not this team that drops back and throws it to receivers 80 times a game." I wonder what type of team we are? Certainly we aren't a team who throws to receivers, scores touchdowns or has any offensive direction from our supposed guru OC HC. So I ask... What type of team are we?
  2. It's crazy to keep the faith with Taggart at the helm
  3. I've me a break.. You think he was okay because we dropped one ball? He's a TERRIBLE QB.
  4. Flowers was atrocious. Of course he helped lose that game. We have no intermediate passing offense. There is a reason the playcalling completely changed with a cold Bench in the game.
  5. the reason i'm suggesting bench should get a shot is because: QF has regularly missed the most basic of throws. Do I think Bench is an amazing QB: No, i don't. I just think we're a lot more threatening when we can get the ball in more than 2 play maker's hands. Flowers/Mack every play on offense isn't going to work. I think Bench can spread it to Adams, Mack, Price, Bronson and others just because he an throw beyond the LOS.
  6. reading some of these comments makes me feel like im missing something... am i one of the only ones seeing how awful that fade pass was? or how bad of a miss the out route to whitehead was? or how bad the pass to barr was on the seam route?
  7. If this is truly a different team... We'll need to beat Maryland.
  8. I mean I hear you. I just don't get how the 2nd throwing td play happens if he can't throw, Or the 3rd and long dropped pass, or the play at the end of the game? Those were beautiful to me. The ones towards the sidelines were a little off. He created opportunities with his feet but failed to connect I agree. And the deep ball over the middle and on the edge were a hair off. BUT this is the second hand of the season against #11 in the country in their house... I thought he played a darn good game considering what we were expecting. I mean did our offense ever feel anemic??? I felt we were always a throw or broken tackle away. What are you talking about? The offense WAS anemic... We had one huge play and one TD on a very short field....
  9. the maryland game sets the tone for the season... have to win
  10. Cook was ready for the NFL last year as a true freshman
  11. Golson only had a slightly better day because our defense was destroying all things not named cook. Passing lanes were wide open for QF. If its beyond the LOS it's a big challenge.
  12. The Maryland game is going to tell us everything we need to know
  13. Defense was excellent outside of tackling Cook They're a good group
  14. Timing on that comment was perhaps not so great! Nope, but QF proved my point by missing that seam route to Barr which would have brought us within 7.
  15. I go to bench down 17 because he gives us an opportunity to throw a completion beyond the LOS
  16. I hadn't realized that the Orlando market also included Daytona and Melborne. Tampa-St Pete Makes sense as they are actually close to each other. We should get Ft. Myers wrapped in with us too, if they get Daytona and Melbourne. Though, we'd still be 11th even with Ft. Myers/Naples Unfortunately, the size/rank of the DMA doesn't matter if you're not even the favorite college football team of choice within said DMA. Not even in the top 2 favorites in our case. Get your point But it does matter if someone has a network and wants to sell cable subs.
  17. http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/docs/solutions/measurement/television/2015-2016-dma-ranks.pdf Tampa now the #11 DMA
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.