USC stripped of '04 championship

[Ruger7mmmag]

usc would have been a decent nfl team

auburn couldnt even get in top 3

who won ap poll

usc would have beat them by more than they beat ok

you guys either dont remember or you dont know much about college football

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!  Yeah because so many of the stars on that team went on to become such great NFL players.  Seriously anytime anyone says this about ANY college team i get a great laugh. 

No kidding.  They're two biggest stars have been flops for the most part.

[smazza]

they were the 2 best players in college football that year

stay on topic

[Bruce Blingstein]

That USC team is one of the best teams of all time, let alone that year. 

lets not hate get in front of your point of views.

[Rizman]

Auburn won the 2004 National Championship  13-0

[Bull Dozer]

That USC team is one of the best teams of all time, let alone that year. 

lets not hate get in front of your point of views.

Yes, it was a great team.  However, to think it would do well against NFL competition is just asinine.  The differential in talent between even a bad NFL team and a great college team is staggering.  Hollywood Matt can't handle performing against NFL defenses with NFL talent and suddenly hes going to take a team with inferior talent against that same level of competition and lead his team to W's?  That USC team would not win a single game against NFL teams there's just too much talent and depth at the next level. 

[Guest nybullsfan]

The NCAA should award the National Title to the runner up team instead of making it vacant...

Problem is, there were three runners-up

Oklahoma doesn't deserve it since they played so badly against USC

That leaves Auburn or Utah. Which do you give it to? You can't give it to either of them.

We need a playoff.

[Bruce Blingstein]

That USC team is one of the best teams of all time, let alone that year. 

lets not hate get in front of your point of views.

Yes, it was a great team.  However, to think it would do well against NFL competition is just asinine.  The differential in talent between even a bad NFL team and a great college team is staggering.  Hollywood Matt can't handle performing against NFL defenses with NFL talent and suddenly hes going to take a team with inferior talent against that same level of competition and lead his team to W's?  That USC team would not win a single game against NFL teams there's just too much talent and depth at the next level. 

I never made that claim.  I agree with you there.  I dont think USC would have won one game in the NFL vs every teams 2nd string. 

im just saying that team was one of the best of all time. 

[smazza]

That USC team is one of the best teams of all time, let alone that year. 

lets not hate get in front of your point of views.

Yes, it was a great team.  However, to think it would do well against NFL competition is just asinine.  The differential in talent between even a bad NFL team and a great college team is staggering.  Hollywood Matt can't handle performing against NFL defenses with NFL talent and suddenly hes going to take a team with inferior talent against that same level of competition and lead his team to W's?  That USC team would not win a single game against NFL teams there's just too much talent and depth at the next level. 

you say it is staggering

i watched both and disagree with you

assuming usc players didnt get hurt depth issue wouldnt be a factor

i didnt say usc win beat every team

you dont remember 2004 college football season

[smazza]

Auburn won the 2004 National Championship  13-0

usc won ap and bcs title in 2004