Right now, we don't offer a whole lot attractive to any P conference. They can afford to take their time being picky. We seem to be falling for the Fundamental Attribution Error. It essentially notes that "If my team gets promoted to P status, it is because they did it due to internal causes (they wanted it more, worked harder, are more talented, recruited better, etc.), but if my team does not get promoted, it is due to external causes (ESPN hates us, ____ University is blocking us, we don't have an OCS, prior President didn't prioritize it, etc.)
Those with an internal locus of control will most times perform better because they focus on what they have power over. That means working hard enough, recruiting well, coaching better, and finally, winning. AAU status, OCS, our market, palm trees - are external variables and none of that is going to get us promoted. Only one thing will - winning. Yes, we started to possibly turn a corner. But if we want to be courted and not just hope against hope that a P teams leaves their conference and we can be the best nerd picked in gym class to replace them, one season isn't going to do it. It needs to be a trend. I cringe when posters rest their hopes on someone leaving and we being the least undesirable team to fill that spot. I believe we will earn it by winning to the extent that it would look ridiculous to be left out. Backing in doesn't engender a whole lot of pride in me.
Right now, we offer potential. That puts us in a large group. I believe that Coach will make us desirable enough in time. But I don't think a conference is going to offer us millions and millions solely because they would like another team to have a "travel partner" or whatever that means.