usf97 Posted March 16, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 3,649 Reputation: 461 Days Won: 4 Joined: 02/01/2005 Share Posted March 16, 2010 I posted this on the main board on another thread but I felt it should have it's own post.Link: http://blog.pennlive.com/davidjones/2010/03/how_the_big_ten_network_makes.htmlI, like many others, have not been able to find a single good reason a conference would expand past 12 teams. I have seen other people respond with posts like "more money" but they could never give a reason why there would be more money. I think this article gives a legitimate explanation. In this case, I would think the Big Ten would be mad not to expand with Rutgers at the very least. I could then see them adding Mizzou and Pitt. Based on this article, the programs don't really matter. All that matters is market size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usf97 Posted March 16, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 3,649 Reputation: 461 Days Won: 4 Joined: 02/01/2005 Author Share Posted March 16, 2010 Actually if you read this guys next article, then the addition of Pitt and Mizzou is not likely. More like Nebraska & Colorado. Sounds crazy but I get it now. http://blog.pennlive.com/davidjones/2010/03/addition_of_pitt_wouldnt_exten.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted March 16, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted March 16, 2010 usf will land somewhere is big east goes under Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.