Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Randy Johnson


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  999
  • Content Count:  19,229
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  01/14/2002

ahead of Bern's?  that is a very grandiose statement...  It must be **** good then.  I loved Bern's... i've never been to anywhere better.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  99
  • Content Count:  4,517
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/28/2003

Funny to hear the rich get richer with somebody talking about the red sox who have not won a world series since 1918.

I said "rich", not successful ..............  ;)

Don't the Red Sox have one of the highest payrolls along with the Stankees?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,088
  • Content Count:  8,158
  • Reputation:   107
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  02/11/2004

ahead of Bern's?  that is a very grandiose statement...  It must be **** good then.  I loved Bern's... i've never been to anywhere better.  

In terms of the service, Berns has a slight edge on presentation.  The QUALITY of service is stellar in both places.

However, Legal has the edge simply because a good steakhouse is a dime a dozen in Florida.  However, in a state where Shell's passes as good seafood, Legal is hands down the best seafood place I've ever been to.

It's really a toss up.  You can't go wrong with both places.  Just don't eat at the Legal in Terminal B of Logan.  Only bad service I've ever had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  999
  • Content Count:  19,229
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  01/14/2002

But a steakhouse in florida is equivilant to a seafood restraunt in new england, both are "their" thing.

I'll take your word though that Legal is the Berns of the north  ;D

I would guess that Legal is cheaper than Berns?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  104
  • Content Count:  2,464
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/16/2003

I said "rich", not successful ..............  ;)

Don't the Red Sox have one of the highest payrolls along with the Stankees?

High payrolls dont mean chit. Ask peter angelos about that.  I do hear what you are saying but the sox could spend 500 million a year and if they dont win a **** series how good did it work. You know kinda like the Yanks the last three years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  9,898
  • Content Count:  66,091
  • Reputation:   2,434
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  01/01/2001

boston would be crazy to go after johnson and give up top prospects

they will not catch the yankees with johnson

i do not want giants to give up prospects to get johnson for a year or to on the chance he has something lefty in tank

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  104
  • Content Count:  2,464
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/16/2003

boston would be crazy to go after johnson and give up top prospects

they will not catch the yankees with johnson

i do not want giants to give up prospects to get johnson for a year or to on the chance he has something lefty in tank

They dont have to catch the yankees. They need to make the playoffs and beat the yankees in the playoffs. Having Schilling, RJ, and Pedro pitching in any playoff series is pretty nasty. Also, Sox have no prospects as they would probably trade Nomar for prospects and then deal those prospects so it would be kinda like nomar for big unit and nomar is probably leaving in free agency anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  999
  • Content Count:  19,229
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  01/14/2002

Sox have some prospects that are good, but i would be more for using Kim, Mendoza, and Millar as trade bait, if we could keep Nomar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  104
  • Content Count:  2,464
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/16/2003

Sox have some prospects that are good, but i would be more for using Kim, Mendoza, and Millar as trade bait, if we could keep Nomar.

Boston Herald has an article saying sox are not pursuing RJ and have about a 1-10% chance of landing him.  I hope this is just smoke and mirrors

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  999
  • Content Count:  19,229
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  01/14/2002

I heard that Gammons said on ESPN radio this morning that the Yanks are going to trade cash for RJ and no talent...

If Bud "hypocrite" selig lets this deal go through, the rest of the league should just quit and form a new baseball league and not invite the yankees or selig.

He said after the Arod deal that he wouldn't allow any Cash only deals.

I hope that gammons is wrong, like he usually is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.