smazza Posted February 10, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,898 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Author Share Posted February 10, 2007 lolThanks for keeping my credibility updated, JoeB, I'll need a reference later.I guess I shouldn't have said they weren't very good, just not as good, or that they were very disappointing.  Certainly not as good as their recruiting should have left them.They had some nice wins, but their losses were to two unranked mediocre teams, yet those losses didn't affect their rankings in the slightest.  Two bad losses and you're still ranked 4th? ;D Sour grapes I guess.In any case, take Georgia, or Tennessee, or Notre Dame and replace USC with them.  Those schools all supposedly get fantastic recruiting classes year in and year out, but the results don't materialize.I can't believe I'm talking about football in February anyway.usc destroyed arkansas on the roaddestroyed nebraska, ND and several other ranked teamsvery few teams with recruiting classes in the 40's or 50's compete for conference titles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now