NewEnglandBull

Perry having a second bad game

Finally

Usual start

USF 16 Perry 14 Egbunu 10 67%

Hope this effort was lay off blues and they come out and play harder Thursday

I was thinking the 72 Olympics

What a game.....

A win is a win

Bulls 0 got 5in OT and can't hot FT.

Then why watch?

He is the leader in pts but Rudd showed no hustle on as at the last seconds.

AC looks weak

I think he meant on the field. Yeah I meant on the field but this is a very good point. The kid did invest two years here so I do retract my point as it realtes to Lynch.

For me, those guys who were here for a cup of coffee are not Bulls. I respect that many take an alternative view and disagree with me but I just don't feel the same compared to a player who was here two to four years. I said the the same thing about JPP. I guess I am old school on this.

Got to get a win here.

Yawn

USF 10 Perry 15 Egbunu 9 77%

I wonder how many of you complaining would have really went.

Wow sounds like my sons little league with the number of awards they give out.

Good for him as Dallas D is terrible this year.

So how much are they paying you to attend games next year?

Why do we have a better recruiting class than UCF? They could just as easily go there as well. Just because they are relevant now doesn't mean they will be in the long term. Just because we are irrelevant now, doesn't mean we will be in the long term. You people need to unf**k your brains. I think you have to define "long term." There are some transfers who may care more about recent success as they don't have as much eligibility time compared to a new recruit. Thus, it is wrong to compare the results of our recruiting to potential transfers. So, now you can go unfuc* your brain. I would agree, if these were juniors and seniors transferring. They are not. I'd also agree if they lived closer to Orlando, they live right in USF's backyard. These transfers have to sit out a year regardless, so recent success really doesn't mean anything now does it? And again, why would recruits not hop on with C. Florida then? What's the difference? They haven't signed anything yet. That 1 year is going to make a big difference? 2014-2017 when compared to 2015-2017? Good points and I hope you are correct. My only issue is that the tone of this thread from many is that all of these players want to come to USF, all we have to do is say yes, that there will be no competition from other schools, and that they all will be rock stars since they went to UF. I just don't see it that way. If we get one good one I would be happy. Indeed, I look at these guys as damaged goods. If we have immediate needs (which we do), I prefer the JUCO route.

I think it is time this thread got on the little bus.

Why do we have a better recruiting class than UCF? They could just as easily go there as well. Just because they are relevant now doesn't mean they will be in the long term. Just because we are irrelevant now, doesn't mean we will be in the long term. You people need to unf**k your brains. I think you have to define "long term." There are some transfers who may care more about recent success as they don't have as much eligibility time compared to a new recruit. Thus, it is wrong to compare the results of our recruiting to potential transfers. So, now you can go unfuc* your brain.

I would rather USF be poor and win (even at a lower level) than rich and lose (see Iowa State/WVU/Wash State,etc).