Jump to content

sloan1919

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    198

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by sloan1919

  1. sloan1919
  2. sloan1919
    What are you smoking? "Talking about and working on an OCS". You realize they have been "taking about" it for over a decade. We consistently understand our peers regarding football. UCF (as an AAC member) spent 32% more than we did this year. The IPF was a minimum requirement. Are peers have had bigger and better ones years ago.
  3. sloan1919
    No. That would be your mother. She still working OBT in Orlando or did she get a promotion to Nebraska in Tampa? Would be nice to catch up with her again.
  4. sloan1919
    It is clear from the admin’s actions (e.g., lack of funding, doing the bare minimum on facilities, focusing only on coaches without HC experience). We’ve come a long way from those, “ we deserve to sit at the table USF, UF, UM, FSU” billboards. Are you guys okay with this regression? Have you accepted it?
  5. sloan1919
    They are leaving
  6. sloan1919
    This thought process reminds me of companies that could not survive as workers increased their mobility and stopped staying at one job for their entire careers. It’s about changing from thinking “we need to come up with ways to stop coaches from leaving” to “we need to invest into the program so they don’t want to leave”.
  7. sloan1919
    What is the alternative you are suggesting? Get a ****** coach that nobody wants and keep losing? Even if you got a crappy coach, if he ever had success you would have the same exact problem. So what are you suggesting?
  8. sloan1919
    Can someone confirm? We are the only FBS team this year that has not a single FBS win. I blame Kelley, Scott, and all of your idiots that were like “he needs another year” or “he is rebuilding”. If you said that at any point, you should be banned for making any comment on coaching or performance from here on out.
  9. sloan1919
    Even if they get rid of Scott. The USF parents will **** it up. “We want someone who is wholesome”. “Who we can respect”. “Someone who we are proud to teach our kids”. “Someone who is going to stick around”. “We aren’t a stepping stone”. Etc. etc. etc. Literally every criteria except someone who knows how to win a ballgame.
  10. sloan1919
    Nice win. Rewarded with a top 25 ranking. Congrats!!
  11. sloan1919
    Does that one win count? It was n FCS team,
  12. sloan1919
    Yes. $2.5m
  13. sloan1919
    Hired Lane Kiffin instead of listening to all the idiots that think 1) we are in a position to avoid hiring good coaches with baggage 2) that every coach needs to be a “forever” coach.
  14. sloan1919
    That’s all.
  15. sloan1919
    We have 0 in the bag. A win against FCS is nothing but us paying someone to lose. That **** doesn’t count.
  16. sloan1919
    Gotta say, they are looking respectable out there.
  17. sloan1919
    1.) Gainesville 2.) 52-3 3) Mangham 4) Weaver 5) 83
  18. sloan1919
    BS. We were number 2 in football back in the day.
  19. sloan1919
    Howard is looking great. Good for them.
  20. sloan1919
    Pressure makes diamonds. Jeff knows what he doing. lol
  21. sloan1919
    I'd switch to liquor if I was you.
  22. sloan1919
    “I felt like we were prepared, but obviously we weren’t,” third-year USF coach Jeff Scott said. “… It was surprising that we couldn’t find much success on either side of the ball.” Doesn’t the above mean he isn’t the guy? He clearly isn’t aware of the level of preparedness that is needed to compete at this level. Thoughts?
  23. sloan1919
    Are you guys crazy? Nobody in their right mind would let USF into a bowl game. We’re terrible, we don’t have any fans, and there are literally 120 schools that would be a better fit.
  24. sloan1919
    This is what most fans here want. A bunch of feel good losers. I was passed we based on Kiffin when we had the chance.
  25. sloan1919
    The OCS is just a building and isn’t responsible for the state of the program. However, it is a symptom of a bigger problem. When I, as a parent of a potential recruit, am faced with two options: 1) School A that consistently invests in athletics and the numbers back it up or 2) School B that talks a huuugggeee game “we are already there” etc. but consistently underinvests in athletics and is not only way below the national median, but at the bottom of the AAC in terms of $$$s. Which do you think I’m picking? Also, think about it from coaches perspective. They are the ones out there selling the program. Do you really think the other recruiting school aren’t bringing up our investment levels to the parents?
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.

Got it!
Dismiss