Candidate #4 (St. Louis' AD) Woolard ÂÂ

[Guest BasketBull.]

Positives

1) He's a working AD --having a job says a lot.

2) He knows C-USA and USF.

3) Experience and leadership.

Negatives

1) His four answers are useless answers:

http://bulls.tbo.com/bulls/MGATPB44WTD.html

2) He's looking for a better job, but does he offer us more than what we already have? What does he bring?

3) Seems to lack a plan for what USF wants and needs.

----------------

BasketBull's take

Out of 10, I give him a 4. We could promote from within and do better. Nothing personal, it's just my feeling.

[BULLheaded]

I have to agree on this one.  I've felt that all the applicants so far had some pretty good strengths that would benefit us (based on just the interviews) but all I got after this interview was he had some minor experience years ago with washington state. He never even mentioned anything he achieved other the some generic comment about washington state being decent when he was there.

He must come accross better outside the interview since the coaches all seemed impressed but based solely on the article he comes across (hands down) the weakest of the 4 IMO.

[bulls96go]

HE wanted USF to impress HIM!

[smazza]

good candidate