Jump to content

TallyBull

Member
  • Posts

    3,685
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Everything posted by TallyBull

  1. Any news on Traylor? I know Fritz took the UH job, so is Traylor on anyone else's radar? Or is he coming back to UTSA?
  2. I don't expect the true renderings (coming out in April) to look very much like these early designs. Maybe certain themes will remain the same? Of course everyone is free to do what they want with what was released (including pick them apart, like in this thread), but I'm inclined to just wait and see what the more advanced April 2024 designs look like. Ultimately, whatever the nicest stadium we can get for the money is, I'll be happy with that. I welcome the discussion. I'm not suggesting we shouldn't discuss based upon what was released. But I trust the people in charge (including professional engineers) to know what they're doing and to have USF's best interests at heart. If they screw it up, there's not much I can do about it anyways. Highly unlikely it'll be worse than what C. Florida has.
  3. Oliver Luck probably wouldn't be interested, but... maybe someone should give him a call.
  4. Looking forward to the replies arguing that unless the OCS cost $500 million and is in effect the equivalent of an NFL stadium, it might actually hurt USF's chances - should have stayed in RJS. 3... 2... 1...
  5. With any luck this mistreatment will hasten the departure of FSU from the ACC to the B1G and open up a spot for USF.
  6. I'm not surprised that people are picking these CONCEPTUAL designs apart. And I won't be surprised that we'll have people complaining no matter what is ultimately built. Looking forward to September 2027.
  7. East-west orientation and location of the tower should build in a significant amount of shade for the home side, plus the design will allow for adding additional shade structures later. I'm satisfied the issue has been addressed and not simply ignored like it doesn't matter (you're right, it very much does).
  8. Not only that, but we'd have way fewer teams to compete against to get a playoff spot. So there's that, too.
  9. It's possible, but that would be an awful tease. Will Weatherford directly responded "see you Tuesday" to an X post begging for renderings at College Gameday. I think we do see something.
  10. 9:30 to 12:30. There will be a livestream but the stadium discussion will be towards the end.
  11. People are complaining right now and threatening massive changes but I bet by Wednesday everyone will have moved on (except for FSU fans, who will play this out in an endless loop like they do with their war chant aka the “tortured native”).
  12. But not as cruel because you’ll only have to wait until tomorrow for the real deal!
  13. Obviously not clear yet, but if this change is to ensure there is some kind of (cost-effective) shade at the stadium, it’s absolutely the right decision (even if it delays the stadium a year), if the alternative was no shade. Would much rather they do things right than quickly.
  14. Looks like we’ll be getting renderings on Tuesday, otherwise this would be an awful tease
  15. Yes, it appears so. Looks like the purpose of these changes is to give USF more control of what is built, and at what cost. But it's still on schedule - construction starts in 2024 and ends in 2026 in time for the 2026-27 season.
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.