SilverBull

What looked like it could be a laugher win for Charlotte turned into a horror show in the YC.  Great comeback, great effort, great support by the crowd.  Return trip up to Charlotte will be packed and nuts.  Let's tell 'em:

Go Bulls!

35 minutes ago, USFBulls12 said:

3 hours ago, USF_Bullsharks said:

 

Expand  

If we beat Charlotte tonight, we will be on Joe Lunardi’s bracketology as the AQ for the AAC until we lose before or to FAU. If we don’t lose, we’ll stay the AQ until the conference championship.

I really don't understand his comments when there is about half of the conference schedule to play and we play Charlotte again.

1 hour ago, BDYZR said:

1 hour ago, Gat-Rat Bull said:

I wish I had my 37 year old self to run in my weekly full court hoops games every Sunday morning. Just wait until you are in your 50s...

Now I'm wondering what the average age of TBP membership is. My guess is somewhere around 55.

I'm above average! 

Hey, we may be old but we're immature, so we have that going for us.

1 hour ago, Rizman said:

3 hours ago, BULLSHTR said:

Answering my own question:

Looking at this year... the following P5 teams would have been relegated (finished dead last)

B1G — Indiana

SEC — Vanderbilt

ACC — Wake Forest

B12 — Cincinatti

PAC12 — Colorado (lmao)

 

 

Previous season (2022)

B1G — Northwestern

SEC — Vanderbilt

ACC — Virginia Tech (toss up with Virginia and BC)

B12 — Iowa State

PAC12 — Colorado

 

So far no surprises.. Let's look at a pre-covid season (2019)

B1G — Rutgers

SEC — Arkansas (are they still considered blue blood? whatever, RELEGATED)

ACC — NC State (lost H2H against GT and has worse conference record)

B12 — Kansas

PAC12 — Arizona

 

 

I think this would be awesome for the sport. Just my humble opinion.

The greedy leaders of some of those institutions would not go for it.  I like the idea a lot.

The only relegation coming soon is perhaps the P2 relegating everybody else to irrelevancy.

14 minutes ago, Rocky Style said:

2 hours ago, flsportsfan83 said:

CBB has a very good system, much better than CFB. 

The CFB system is trash essentially.

And likely to get worse before getting better.

I certainly like what I've seen so far from Coach.   So VPMK is a genius, of course until he isn't....

33 minutes ago, cophbulls said:

Ha, no way we get into the dance save for winning out

That, unfortunately, is likely our reality, or at least winning the tournament.

5 minutes ago, Triple B said:

34 minutes ago, cophbulls said:

No way Charlotte is the AQ but thats prolly AAC only hope to get > 1 team in. My AQ is FAU with SMU as first team out. Memphis, UNT and Charlotte have work to do.

What are you basing that on? Seems to me they've got pretty much the same chance as any of that top half dozen or so in the conference right now.

Most of the talking heads of basketball I have listened to seem to be favoring Charlotte to take the conference.  We need to start tonight to change that narrative.

This all sounds like our fans have a problem with the NIT-picking formula.  The best answer is for us to win out.  I don't know how much longer we can ride the glory of our ***** Pill CBI Championship from 2019.

1 hour ago, CousinRicky said:

2 hours ago, MMW said:

What's that body of water in the background?

It's the sailing teams OCSPF  (on campus sailing practice facility).  

It's kind of like when a the Jaws 3 killer shark made it into Seaworld in Orlando.

9 minutes ago, 79 Bull said:

43 minutes ago, USFBulls12 said:

I'm so out of touch, I guess...Who is this music act? Never heard of him but he's selling out the 10,500 seat YC. Google says he's only 31 years old and plays bluegrass music..? Is this the correct person, anyone know?

No clue who he is but he sold out last year.

Never heard of Billy Strings?   He's kind of a kindred spirit Soggy Bottom Boys for the new generation.

40 minutes ago, BullyPulpit said:

I hope that VPMK and CAAR are working the phones hard to try and get some good non-conference road games for next season. Have to play at least 4 decent OOC teams in order to inflate the NET ranking moving forward. 

Gotta remember not only to schedule higher visibility teams, but also to beat them.

Yeah, I never got how the university DSO is considered a state agency for sovereign immunity purposes but not for public records purposes.

40 minutes ago, MaltLiquorBull said:

57 minutes ago, CousinRicky said:

So getting to an OCB Off Campus Bar is okay but they can't get to an Off Campus Stadium.  Hmmmmmm.  

Hmmmmm.  Maybe it was NOT having an "on campus stadium" that caused the night life to move so far off campus.  

Going from my day, I think the change in the legal drinking age had a greater negative impact on nightlife around USF than anything else.

Memphis just looks like a totally different team since we beat them.  When I watched them early on they looked tough and it is hard to believe they went into such a tailspin but, when we played, it was two teams moving in very different season trajectories.

12 hours ago, Dave_Glaser said:

I used to try to project to “next year” but I’ve learned to live in the moment. The last “next year” I was excited about was bringing back nearly the entire CBI championship team. Then Yetna went down and it went south. And now there’s that portal thing.

You and me both brother.  As my teenage daughter repeats to me over and over:

12 minutes ago, Triple B said:

33 minutes ago, USFBulls12 said:

I'm more concerned about one of those games where the entire team goes cold yet we've become so accustomed to hitting many 3s that we keep jacking them up and bricking everything.

It's gonna happen and it'll show how good of a team we really are if we can ratchet up other aspects of the game enough to compensate ...

While I am amazed at the shooting in every game that I watch (is that really USF?), our guys have to be prepared to play in all conditions when and if something bad happens.  Oh say, like a return to tradition.

But I think they have the all around effort and grit to overcome a cold night. 

Go Bulls!

6 minutes ago, BDYZR said:

I guess what I’m saying is that if Kaiser and Stetson can afford sports/football then it really doesn’t matter what the P whatever’s do. USF will be just fine.

Gotcha.  But I guess we'll see how the mighty Keiser Seahawks program performs after losing their version of "Jim Leavitt" to my backyard Lenoir-Rhyne Bears program.

Keiser loses football coach Doug Socha, finds replacement in Myles Russ

WWW.WPTV.COM

---

A little more than an hour after Keiser head football coach Doug Socha left for a new job, the Seahawks were quick to announce his replacement.

Here is the text of the article:

The Final Four would have played out in Atlanta this weekend if not for the shutdown forced by the pandemic. Its absence has only made sporting hearts grow fonder for college basketball’s premier event and redirected the affection toward nostalgia.

In Indianapolis, that brings to mind the one at Market Square Arena in 1980. It was the first of seven the city has hosted, with two more (2021 and 2026) on the docket. At that time, it stood as the biggest sporting event ever conducted in these parts that didn’t take place on a 2-1/2-mile oval.

That Final Four will be remembered for the championship won by Louisville and the runner-up run of the UCLA team coached by future Pacers mentor Larry Brown, and, for some, the sensation caused by the scantily clad UCLA song girls. But, thanks to Purdue, it also stands as a reminder of the immense challenges that go into building and sustaining a winning organization.

The Boilermakers of that season provide a case study in both sports and corporate-world issues, including executive leadership, middle management conduct and hiring practices. Even if an organization (athletic department) does manage to pull off the difficult task of landing a manager (coach) with exceptional skill to guide a group of talented employees (players), obstacles remain. Chemistry across all levels, funding and unpredictable factors (such as health and personal problems) are always a threat.

So many things can go wrong, in fact, that sometimes it seems the only reason any team ever wins a national championship is that the tournament format requires that one do it.

Making a great run

Purdue lost nine regular-season games that season and finished third in the Big Ten behind Indiana and Ohio State. It got into the NCAA tournament only because the field had just been expanded to 48 teams and more than two teams from each conference could be admitted. Its 1980 tournament run was propelled by playing its first two games on its home court in Mackey Arena. Those victories led it to the Mideast Regional in Lexington, where it eliminated Indiana and then Duke, which had defeated the No. 1 seed, Kentucky.

So, there it was, just two victories short of a national championship. It was a six-seed and therefore a logical long shot, but it had legitimate reasons for optimism. Center Joe Barry Carroll would become the first pick of that year’s NBA draft and Keith Edmonson would be the 10th overall pick two years later. Two other starters, Drake Morris and Brian Walker, were all-state selections out of Indiana high schools and the fifth, Arnette Hallman, was a physically gifted role-playing junior college transfer.

The dream ended with a five-point semifinal loss to UCLA on Saturday, a game in which Purdue was competitive throughout. Final Four defeats are one thing when you feel like you play your best and lose to a better team. They are quite another when you feel you didn’t perform near a peak level.

“I feel like we lost today and not like we were beaten by a better team,” Walker said in the postgame press conference. “This is a game I’ll remember for the rest of my life.”

“We played like it was the third or fourth game of the season,” Hallman added. “We played so poorly.”

The 17-point consolation victory over Iowa provided something like the hint of a happy ending but felt more like being damned with faint praise. Consolation games had once been regarded as a nice way to keep everyone occupied after so many people had bothered to attend a tournament but by then were becoming meaningless relics. The one in 1981 would be the last.

Some possible factors in the Boilermakers’ fate were no fault of their own. They were coming off a regional that looked and felt more like a Final Four than the actual Final Four did. Beating in-state rival Indiana after the Hoosiers had won the Big Ten title was huge, as was eliminating another blueblood program, Duke, two days later. Strange as it seems, they could have suffered a bit of an emotional letdown. It didn’t help that they were coming off a week of final exams, which disrupted practice schedules and focus.

Playing an hour’s bus ride from campus in an arena where some of the players had already competed in high school took some shine off the event. Also, Hallman was carrying an emotional burden that might have contributed to his 1-of-7 shooting performance against UCLA; his father had died the previous weekend.

Dig deeper, though, and you’ll find more fundamental factors that might have been preventable.

Trouble brewing

Purdue’s season ended under the cloud cover of rumors that its coach, Lee Rose, might leave. An article in the Tampa Tribune on Feb. 27 reported that the University of South Florida’s athletic director had asked for and received permission to interview Rose for its head coaching position, which only confirmed the buzz around the Lafayette community.

Superficially, it made no sense. His coaching resume was to envy and only getting better. Before arriving at Purdue, he had won 74% of his games over eight seasons at Division II Transylvania and 80% of his games over three seasons at North Carolina-Charlotte. UNCC won its conference and reached the final game of the NIT in his first season. It followed up by shocking the college basketball world by advancing to the 1977 Final Four, where it lost to eventual champion Marquette by two points in the Saturday semifinals.

He had kept it rolling at Purdue, leading Purdue to the championship game of the NIT his first season, where it lost to Indiana by one point in the final game, then to the Final Four. The impression was that things were progressing smoothly, but they weren’t. And it’s easy to see in hindsight that Rose’s tenure at Purdue was perhaps destined to be brief.

In short, he was a brilliant tactician who didn’t fit Purdue’s culture, a point that could be taken as an indictment of either side. He was, in particular, a mismatch with Athletic Director George King. Rose stated in a recent self-published book, “Coach Lee Rose: On Family and Basketball,”—which was produced with help from his wife, Eleanor, and Carroll—that he had interviewed for the job with Fred Schaus, his coaching predecessor and newly named assistant athletic director, rather than King, who was recovering from a surgery. When he finally met King after reaching an agreement with Schaus, he says the first words out of King’s mouth were—quite seriously—“You’ll never make more money than I do.”

Rose also was irritated by an array of relatively minor but perhaps unnecessary issues, similar to those that other Purdue coaches complained about before Big Ten Network money began rolling in. Alan Karpick, a sophomore student manager on the Final Four team and now publisher of the primary website for Purdue fans, GoldandBlack.com, recalls Rose often lamenting the athletic department’s tightly drawn purse strings.

The disconnect ran both ways, however. Rose, a native of Kentucky, was a prim and proper Southern gentleman who could be prickly at times. That made him a round peg in the square hole of Purdue’s athletic culture, a three-piece suit amid good ol’ boys. Although he made some close friends in Lafayette, he didn’t particularly enjoy mixing at alumni functions and was struggling to get a foothold with high school coaches.

He wasn’t a screamer and didn’t swear, but he had a harsh, sarcastic manner that tended to build resentment among players. There was the time in practice he berated a starter for allowing a walk-on (John Anthrop) to score on him, which insulted both players. On another occasion, he punished backup guard (and future coach) Kevin Stallings for a transgression by making him sit in a chair and watch practice from courtside.

Rose’s unique scoring system for evaluating players caused further friction. Statistics were recorded of every practice scrimmage and the results were posted daily. Some areas were weighted more heavily than others. It kept pressure on the players to perform but gave power to the student managers who compiled the stats. Karpick recalls players coming to him to plead their cases.

They likely wouldn’t have felt comfortable taking questions or complaints to Rose. He once said in a radio interview he told his players, “If you can’t improve on silence, I don’t want to hear from you.” He never seemed at ease with the media, either.

Perhaps it shouldn’t be all that surprising then that, when Rose gathered his coaching staff and players a day after their season had ended to tell them he was seriously considering the South Florida offer, feelings were mixed. A few people mumbled a desire for him to stay, but Morris, the starting forward who was sitting just a few seats to the left of Rose, leaned over to Assistant Coach Bill Keller and said, loudly enough to be overheard, “I hope he leaves.”

That sentiment wasn’t Morris’ alone, but also wasn’t unanimous. Winning helped dampen doubts and the star players were given little to complain about. Future NBA guard and coach Jerry Sichting, who played three seasons for Schaus before playing out his senior season with Rose, credits Rose with bringing structure and discipline to Purdue’s program.

“He was an unbelievable college coach,” Sichting once said in a radio interview. “I wish I had him all four years.”

No Purdue player would ever have that experience. Three days after Purdue’s Final Four appearance, two days after a pep rally in Mackey Arena that drew more than 5,000 fans and one day after the team banquet, Rose’s rumored departure became official. Then 43, he accepted a financial package from USF that was roughly double his $41,000 salary at Purdue. King told reporters he had offered Rose a generous raise and accepted the resignation “with reluctance.”

Life moved on, of course. Rose coached for six seasons at South Florida, compiling a 106-99 record. His teams never reached the NCAA tournament, settling for three brief NIT appearances. He wound up being disappointed with his administration there, too. Budgets were cut, promises weren’t kept and tension mounted. His exit from USF left hard feelings all around. While rumors about his future flew throughout Tampa after the 1985-1986 season, he didn’t announce he was leaving until July, after the NBA San Antonio Spurs offered an assistant coaching position. He went quietly, via a press release, and nobody seemed sorry about it.

Purdue moved on as well. Exactly one week after Rose’s departure was announced, Gene Keady was introduced as its next coach. He proved to be a better fit, with both King and the Purdue community. He was practically the opposite of Rose—far from genteel and a screamer on the court, but one who made better connections. “He can chew your ass and make you like it,” was how some of them put it.

None of Keady’s teams ever reached the Final Four, but they won six Big Ten titles in his 25 seasons. He’s a beloved icon now. The Mackey Arena court bears his name and he returns often from his home in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, for football and basketball games.

‘It just wasn’t a fit’

It’s practically unprecedented in the history of college basketball that a second-year coach of a Big Ten team that just played in the Final Four would leave so abruptly for a mid-major program with no tradition. It also seems wrong that a coach as talented as Rose would wind down his career in virtual anonymity, working off and on as an assistant for five teams from 1986 to 2008, as well as for the league office. But it happened.

It’s a woulda-coulda-shoulda story of the kind that occurs in sports and in business when the pieces don’t quite fall into place. Nobody deserves all the blame for this one. Everyone surely could have done something a little differently, a little better, to prevent the breakup. Or maybe the situation could have been avoided in the first place with more vetting and communication before the hire that might have warned all parties of the mismatch.

Rose for one never second-guessed himself, at least publicly. Thirty years after leaving Purdue, he summarized it simply: “I’ve wished many times that it worked out. But it just wasn’t a fit.”

Forty years later, most of the rough edges have been smoothed by the sands falling through the hourglass. Rose stayed in touch with some friends in the Lafayette area and was back in Mackey Arena for a game in the 2011-2012 season. He received a standing ovation when he was introduced. Eight players from the 1980 Final Four team, Carroll excluded, were back for a “Legends of Mackey” celebration in the 2017-2018 season, but no coaches. Rose, now 83 and living in North Carolina, is afflicted with Alzheimer’s disease and was unable to attend.

The informal gatherings that weekend produced plenty of laughs and pleasant memories for the players from one of Purdue’s greatest teams. But the virus of regret can’t be canceled.•

1 minute ago, BDYZR said:

I'm not suggesting that there won’t be changes. Any of those schools fold their programs? No. They changed. 

I get it.  And I never said any of the P2 would shutter their programs.  I was just saying the ranks of what teams are amongst the "haves" and "have nots" can change pretty rapidly with the circumstances.

5 minutes ago, Triple B said:

That had to be one of the strangest career moves ever in college sports …

Yes, sometimes we out-think ourselves.  I thought this article lended an interesting perspective from the Coach.

MARK MONTIETH: Coach’s exit followed Purdue’s 1980 Final Four run – Indianapolis Business Journal

WWW.IBJ.COM

---

Coaches don't usually leave for a smaller program after a big tournament run, but this divorce made sense.

9 minutes ago, Triple B said:

54 minutes ago, panchosanchez99 said:

Actually, I would say that the rise of MBB came under Lee Rose, the coach just prior to Paschal. Prior to Rose's arrival, USF had a record of 87 wins and 99 losses. Prior to arriving to USF, Rose, in 5 years of coaching (3 years at Charlotte and 2 years at Purdue) won at least 20 wins in every year. He also took Charlotte and Purdue to the final four in his second year at each school. After, the final four appearance at Purdue, he came to USF and went 18-11 in his first year, after the team went 6-21 the year before.

Rose never had a losing record at USF. He is the winningest coach in USF MBB history, by percentage, at 106-69. Although he did not make an NCAA appearance in his 6 years at USF, he became the first coach at USF to beat ranked teams, and he took them to several NIT appearances. If he did not leave for the NBA, he would have probably taken them to multiple NCAA appearances.

I would say that the rise of the program began with Lee and 2 players, Tony Grier, followed by Charlie Bradley. Rose has to be one of the most successful college coaches to never win an NCAA championship.

Totally agree that Rose was the beginning of the rise but not sure about the if he had stayed part. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that his last year here was the worst of his head coaching career. He possibly had just burnt out with the whole college coaching thing and all that went with it. 

I think there was a whole lot of excitement and enthusiasm for the Bulls when Lee Rose came to town from everyone -- except perhaps Lee Rose.  I got the impression he never felt truly comfortable at USF and thought the program lacked a "big-time" imprimatur.

1 minute ago, BDYZR said:

10 minutes ago, SilverBull said:

Expand  

I think the doomsday thoughts are a bit insane. IF that scenario were possible there wouldn’t be any lower level leagues now.

That what my friends in the PAC12 told me last year.  

But seriously, who knows what will be the result of all the crazy stuff that has happened in the last few years.

10 hours ago, CousinRicky said:

Has he announced his retirement?

Yes, before Christmas.

Commissioner Mike Aresco Announces Retirement

THEAMERICAN.ORG

---

IRVING, Texas – Mike Aresco, the American Athletic Conference’s only commissioner in the league’s 11-year history, has announced his plans to retire at the end of the...

27 minutes ago, BDYZR said:

Understanding the premise of the P2, but exactly what does any school have that makes them attractive? Maybe 3-5 schools have some clout, but the vast majority offer nothing substantial. Will the P2 be willing to pare the Vandy’s or Indiana’s to make room? I mean let’s face it, will the SEC cut Vandy for UNC? Will the B1G cut Indiana for FSU? Will TV make up the difference?

I believe the colossal egos of leadership in the those two conferences keeps them from doing so.  But eventually, after the B1G and SEC kill off all the "lower" conference programs, they will have nowhere else to turn than to start cannibalizing their own.  Welcome to the P2 picnic!

A portrait of me in my 52nd year of Bulls fandom.  In spite of more disappointments than I can count, I keep the candle burning.  Go Bulls!